Dietary supplement: Difference between revisions

From Azupedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "thumb|As a pill thumb|As a capsule thumb|As a tablet thumb|As a softgel capsule used for fish oil or large amounts of vitamin E thumb|As a [[milkshake|shake and bottled powder]] File:A Chemist Carries On- the work of Allen and Hanburys in the Production of Cod Liver Oil, 1942 D6761.jpg|thumb|Production of..."
 
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{サプリメント}}
{{横線}}
<languages />
<translate>
<!--T:1-->
[[File:Iodine pills.jpg|thumb|As a pill]]
[[File:Iodine pills.jpg|thumb|As a pill]]
[[File:Spirulina Capsules.jpg|thumb|As a capsule]]
[[File:Spirulina Capsules.jpg|thumb|As a capsule]]
Line 4: Line 11:
[[File:Codliveroilcapsules.jpg|thumb|As a softgel capsule used for fish oil or large amounts of vitamin E]]
[[File:Codliveroilcapsules.jpg|thumb|As a softgel capsule used for fish oil or large amounts of vitamin E]]
[[File:Vega protein powders.jpg|thumb|As a [[milkshake|shake]] and bottled powder]]
[[File:Vega protein powders.jpg|thumb|As a [[milkshake|shake]] and bottled powder]]
[[File:A Chemist Carries On- the work of Allen and Hanburys in the Production of Cod Liver Oil, 1942 D6761.jpg|thumb|Production of [[cod liver oil]], one of the first dietary supplement products manufactured, in the 18th century<ref name="eb">{{cite web |title=Cod liver oil |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/cod-liver-oil |work=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=18 February 2018 |date=2018}}</ref>]]
[[File:A Chemist Carries On- the work of Allen and Hanburys in the Production of Cod Liver Oil, 1942 D6761.jpg|thumb|Production of [[cod liver oil]], one of the first dietary supplement products manufactured, in the 18th century]]


<!--T:2-->
<!-- Definition -->
<!-- Definition -->
A '''dietary supplement''' is a manufactured product intended to supplement one's diet by taking a [[pill (pharmacy)|pill]], [[capsule (pharmacy)|capsule]], [[tablet (pharmacy)|tablet]], powder, or liquid.<ref name="ods-nih">{{cite web |title=Dietary Supplements: Background Information |url=https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/DietarySupplements-HealthProfessional/ |publisher=Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health|access-date=2 February 2018|date=24 June 2011|archive-date=14 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200814221351/https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/DietarySupplements-HealthProfessional/|url-status=dead}}</ref> A supplement can provide [[nutrient]]s either extracted from food sources or that are synthetic in order to increase the quantity of their consumption. The class of nutrient compounds includes [[vitamin]]s, [[Dietary mineral|minerals]], [[Dietary fiber|fiber]], [[fatty acid]]s, and [[amino acid]]s. Dietary supplements can also contain substances that have not been confirmed as being essential to life, but are marketed as having a beneficial biological effect, such as plant [[pigment]]s or [[polyphenol]]s. Animals can also be a source of supplement ingredients, such as [[collagen]] from [[chicken]]s or [[fish]] for example. These are also sold individually and in combination, and may be combined with nutrient ingredients. The [[European Commission]] has also established harmonized rules to help insure that food supplements are safe and appropriately labeled.<ref name="efsa">{{cite web|url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/food-supplements|title=Food Supplements|publisher=European Food Safety Authority, European Commission|date=2009}}</ref>
A '''dietary supplement''' is a manufactured product intended to supplement one's diet by taking a [[pill (pharmacy)|pill]], [[capsule (pharmacy)|capsule]], [[tablet (pharmacy)|tablet]], powder, or liquid. A supplement can provide [[nutrient]]s either extracted from food sources or that are synthetic in order to increase the quantity of their consumption. The class of nutrient compounds includes [[vitamin]]s, [[Dietary mineral|minerals]], [[Dietary fiber|fiber]], [[fatty acid]]s, and [[amino acid]]s. Dietary supplements can also contain substances that have not been confirmed as being essential to life, but are marketed as having a beneficial biological effect, such as plant [[pigment]]s or [[polyphenol]]s. Animals can also be a source of supplement ingredients, such as [[collagen]] from [[chicken]]s or [[fish]] for example. These are also sold individually and in combination, and may be combined with nutrient ingredients. The [[European Commission]] has also established harmonized rules to help insure that food supplements are safe and appropriately labeled.


<!--T:3-->
<!-- Industry -->
<!-- Industry -->
Creating an industry estimated to have a value of $151.9 billion in 2021,<ref name="GVW_Report">{{cite web |title=Dietary Supplements Market Size & Trends Report, 2021-2028 |url=https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/dietary-supplements-market |access-date=2021-07-30 | location = San Francisco, CA | work = Grand View Research |language=en}}</ref> there are more than 50,000 dietary supplement products marketed in the United States,<ref name="odsdata">{{cite web|url=https://ods.od.nih.gov/Research/Dietary_Supplement_Label_Database.aspx|title=Dietary Supplement Label Database|publisher= Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health|date=2017}}</ref> where about 50% of the American adult population consumes dietary supplements. [[Multivitamin]]s are the most commonly used product among types of dietary supplements.<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Park M |title=Half of Americans use supplements|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/04/13/supplements.dietary/index.html|work=CNN|access-date=3 October 2013}}</ref> The United States [[National Institutes of Health]] states that supplements "may be of value" for those who are nutrient deficient from their diet and receive approval from their medical provider.<ref name="odsfaqs">{{cite web|url=http://ods.od.nih.gov/Health_Information/ODS_Frequently_Asked_Questions.aspx|title=FAQs on Dietary Supplements|publisher= Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health}}</ref>
Creating an industry estimated to have a value of $151.9 billion in 2021, there are more than 50,000 dietary supplement products marketed in the United States, where about 50% of the American adult population consumes dietary supplements. [[Multivitamin]]s are the most commonly used product among types of dietary supplements. The United States [[National Institutes of Health]] states that supplements "may be of value" for those who are nutrient deficient from their diet and receive approval from their medical provider.


<!--T:4-->
<!-- Regulation -->
<!-- Regulation -->
In the United States, it is against federal regulations for supplement manufacturers to [[health claim|claim]] that these products prevent or treat any disease. Companies are allowed to use what is referred to as "Structure/Function" wording if there is substantiation of [[scientific evidence]] for a supplement providing a potential health effect.<ref name="s-f">{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/ucm2006881.htm|title= Structure/Function Claims|publisher=Office of Dietary Supplement Programs, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration|date=14 December 2017}}</ref> An example would be "_____ helps maintain healthy joints", but the label must bear a disclaimer that the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) "has not evaluated the claim" and that the dietary supplement product is not intended to "diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease", because only a [[Medication|drug]] can legally make such a claim.<ref name=s-f/> The FDA enforces these regulations and also prohibits the sale of supplements and supplement ingredients that are dangerous, or supplements not made according to standardized [[good manufacturing practice]]s (GMPs).
In the United States, it is against federal regulations for supplement manufacturers to [[health claim|claim]] that these products prevent or treat any disease. Companies are allowed to use what is referred to as "Structure/Function" wording if there is substantiation of [[scientific evidence]] for a supplement providing a potential health effect. An example would be "_____ helps maintain healthy joints", but the label must bear a disclaimer that the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) "has not evaluated the claim" and that the dietary supplement product is not intended to "diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease", because only a [[Medication|drug]] can legally make such a claim. The FDA enforces these regulations and also prohibits the sale of supplements and supplement ingredients that are dangerous, or supplements not made according to standardized [[good manufacturing practice]]s (GMPs).
__TOC__


==Definition==
==Definition== <!--T:5-->
In the United States, the [[Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994]] provides this description: "The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) defines the term "dietary supplement" to mean a product (other than [[tobacco]]) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, [[metabolite]], constituent, [[extract]], or combination of any of the aforementioned ingredients. Furthermore, a dietary supplement must be labeled as a dietary supplement and be intended for ingestion and must not be represented for use as conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or of the diet. In addition, a dietary supplement cannot be approved or authorized for investigation as a new [[drug]], [[antibiotic]], or biologic, unless it was marketed as a food or a dietary supplement before such approval or authorization. Under DSHEA, dietary supplements are deemed to be food, except for purposes of the drug definition."<ref name=DietSupplLabels>{{cite web | url = https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-01-00120.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20041118061526/https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-01-00120.pdf | archive-date = 18 November 2004 | title =Dietary Supplement Labels: Key Elements | author = Office of Inspector General | publisher = U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | date = 2003 }}</ref>
In the United States, the [[Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994]] provides this description: "The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) defines the term "dietary supplement" to mean a product (other than [[tobacco]]) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, [[metabolite]], constituent, [[extract]], or combination of any of the aforementioned ingredients. Furthermore, a dietary supplement must be labeled as a dietary supplement and be intended for ingestion and must not be represented for use as conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or of the diet. In addition, a dietary supplement cannot be approved or authorized for investigation as a new [[drug]], [[antibiotic]], or biologic, unless it was marketed as a food or a dietary supplement before such approval or authorization. Under DSHEA, dietary supplements are deemed to be food, except for purposes of the drug definition."


Per DSHEA, dietary supplements are consumed orally, and are mainly defined by what they are not: conventional foods (including [[meal replacement]]s), [[medical food]]s,<ref name = "FDA_FAQ_2016">{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/UCM500094.pdf | title = Guidance for Industry: Frequently Asked Questions About Medical Foods | edition = Second | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration | date = May 2016 }}</ref> [[preservative]]s or [[pharmaceutical drugs]]. Products intended for use as a [[nasal spray]], or [[Topical medication|topically]], as a lotion applied to the skin, do not qualify. FDA-approved drugs cannot be ingredients in dietary supplements. Supplement products are or contain [[vitamins]], [[Mineral (nutrient)|nutritionally essential minerals]], [[amino acid]]s, [[essential fatty acid]]s and non-nutrient substances extracted from [[plant]]s or [[animal]]s or [[Fungus|fungi]] or [[bacteria]], or in the instance of [[probiotic]]s, are live bacteria. Dietary supplement ingredients may also be synthetic copies of naturally occurring substances (for example: [[melatonin]]). All products with these ingredients are required to be labeled as dietary supplements.<ref name="DSHEA definition">{{cite book|author1=Committee on the Framework for Evaluating the Safety of Dietary Supplements, Food and Nutrition Board, Board on Life Sciences, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies|title=Dietary supplements a framework for evaluating safety|date=2004|publisher=National Academies Press|location=Washington, D.C.|isbn=978-0-309-09206-7|page=ES-1-ES-3}}</ref> Like foods and unlike drugs, no government approval is required to make or sell dietary supplements; the manufacturer confirms the safety of dietary supplements but the government does not; and rather than requiring [[Risk–benefit ratio|risk–benefit analysis]] to prove that the product can be sold like a drug, such assessment is only used by the FDA to decide that a dietary supplement is unsafe and should be removed from market.<ref name="DSHEA definition" />
<!--T:6-->
Per DSHEA, dietary supplements are consumed orally, and are mainly defined by what they are not: conventional foods (including [[meal replacement]]s), [[medical food]]s, [[preservative]]s or [[pharmaceutical drugs]]. Products intended for use as a [[nasal spray]], or [[Topical medication|topically]], as a lotion applied to the skin, do not qualify. FDA-approved drugs cannot be ingredients in dietary supplements. Supplement products are or contain [[vitamins]], [[Mineral (nutrient)|nutritionally essential minerals]], [[amino acid]]s, [[essential fatty acid]]s and non-nutrient substances extracted from [[plant]]s or [[animal]]s or [[Fungus|fungi]] or [[bacteria]], or in the instance of [[probiotic]]s, are live bacteria. Dietary supplement ingredients may also be synthetic copies of naturally occurring substances (for example: [[melatonin]]). All products with these ingredients are required to be labeled as dietary supplements. Like foods and unlike drugs, no government approval is required to make or sell dietary supplements; the manufacturer confirms the safety of dietary supplements but the government does not; and rather than requiring [[Risk–benefit ratio|risk–benefit analysis]] to prove that the product can be sold like a drug, such assessment is only used by the FDA to decide that a dietary supplement is unsafe and should be removed from market.


==Types==
==Types== <!--T:7-->


===Vitamins===
===Vitamins=== <!--T:8-->
{{main|Vitamin}}
{{main|Vitamin}}
[[File:VitaminSupplementPills.jpg|thumb|right|Pharmacies and supermarkets in the U.S. sell a large variety of vitamin dietary supplements.]]
[[File:VitaminSupplementPills.jpg|thumb|right|Pharmacies and supermarkets in the U.S. sell a large variety of vitamin dietary supplements.]]


A vitamin is an [[organic compound]] required by an [[organism]] as a vital [[nutrient]] in limited amounts.<ref name="Lieberman">Lieberman, S and Bruning, N (1990). The Real Vitamin & Mineral Book. NY: Avery Group, 3, {{ISBN|0-89529-769-8}}.</ref> An organic chemical compound (or related set of compounds) is called a vitamin when it cannot be [[biosynthesis|synthesized]] in sufficient quantities by an organism and must be obtained from the diet. The term is conditional both on the circumstances and on the particular organism. For example, [[ascorbic acid]] (vitamin C) is a vitamin for anthropoid primates, [[human]]s, [[guinea pig]]s and [[bat]]s, but not for other mammals. Vitamin D is not an essential nutrient for people who get sufficient exposure to [[Ultraviolet light therapy|ultraviolet light]], either from the sun or an artificial source, as they synthesize vitamin D in skin.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Drouin G, Godin JR, Pagé B | title = The genetics of vitamin C loss in vertebrates | journal = Current Genomics | volume = 12 | issue = 5 | pages = 371–8 | date = August 2011 | pmid = 22294879 | pmc = 3145266 | doi = 10.2174/138920211796429736 }}</ref> Humans require thirteen vitamins in their diet, most of which are actually groups of related molecules, "vitamers", (e.g. vitamin E includes tocopherols and tocotrienols, vitamin K includes vitamin K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>). The list: vitamins A, C, D, E, K, Thiamine (B<sub>1</sub>), Riboflavin (B<sub>2</sub>), Niacin (B<sub>3</sub>), Pantothenic Acid (B<sub>5</sub>), Vitamin B<sub>6</sub>, Biotin (B<sub>7</sub>), Folate (B<sub>9</sub>) and Vitamin B<sub>12</sub>. Vitamin intake below recommended amounts can result in signs and symptoms associated with vitamin deficiency. There is little evidence of benefit when vitamins are consumed as a dietary supplement by those who are healthy and have a nutritionally adequate diet.<ref name=Fort2013>{{cite journal | vauthors = Fortmann SP, Burda BU, Senger CA, Lin JS, Whitlock EP | title = Vitamin and mineral supplements in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: An updated systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | volume = 159 | issue = 12 | pages = 824–34 | date = December 2013 | pmid = 24217421 | doi = 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00729 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
<!--T:9-->
A vitamin is an [[organic compound]] required by an [[organism]] as a vital [[nutrient]] in limited amounts. An organic chemical compound (or related set of compounds) is called a vitamin when it cannot be [[biosynthesis|synthesized]] in sufficient quantities by an organism and must be obtained from the diet. The term is conditional both on the circumstances and on the particular organism. For example, [[ascorbic acid]] (vitamin C) is a vitamin for anthropoid primates, [[human]]s, [[guinea pig]]s and [[bat]]s, but not for other mammals. Vitamin D is not an essential nutrient for people who get sufficient exposure to [[Ultraviolet light therapy|ultraviolet light]], either from the sun or an artificial source, as they synthesize vitamin D in skin. Humans require thirteen vitamins in their diet, most of which are actually groups of related molecules, "vitamers", (e.g. vitamin E includes tocopherols and tocotrienols, vitamin K includes vitamin K<sub>1</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>). The list: vitamins A, C, D, E, K, Thiamine (B<sub>1</sub>), Riboflavin (B<sub>2</sub>), Niacin (B<sub>3</sub>), Pantothenic Acid (B<sub>5</sub>), Vitamin B<sub>6</sub>, Biotin (B<sub>7</sub>), Folate (B<sub>9</sub>) and Vitamin B<sub>12</sub>. Vitamin intake below recommended amounts can result in signs and symptoms associated with vitamin deficiency. There is little evidence of benefit when vitamins are consumed as a dietary supplement by those who are healthy and have a nutritionally adequate diet.


The [[National Academy of Medicine|U.S. Institute of Medicine]] sets [[tolerable upper intake level]]s (ULs) for some of the vitamins. This does not prevent dietary supplement companies from selling products with content per serving higher than the ULs. For example, the UL for vitamin D is 100&nbsp;µg (4,000 IU),<ref name=IOM>{{citation| title = Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs): Recommended Intakes for Individuals| publisher = Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine, National Academies| year = 2004| url = https://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/dri-tables-and-application-reports| access-date = 2009-06-09}}{{Dead link|date=May 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> but products are available without prescription at 10,000 IU.
<!--T:10-->
The [[National Academy of Medicine|U.S. Institute of Medicine]] sets [[tolerable upper intake level]]s (ULs) for some of the vitamins. This does not prevent dietary supplement companies from selling products with content per serving higher than the ULs. For example, the UL for vitamin D is 100&nbsp;µg (4,000 IU), but products are available without prescription at 10,000 IU.


===Minerals===
===Minerals=== <!--T:11-->
{{main|Mineral (nutrient)}}
{{main|Mineral (nutrient)}}


<!--T:12-->
Minerals are the [[exogenous]] [[chemical element]]s indispensable for life. Four minerals – [[carbon]], [[hydrogen]], [[oxygen]], and [[nitrogen]] – are essential for life but are so ubiquitous in food and drink that these are not considered nutrients and there are no recommended intakes for these as minerals. The need for nitrogen is addressed by requirements set for protein, which is composed of nitrogen-containing amino acids. [[Sulfur]] is essential, but for humans, not identified as having a recommended intake per se. Instead, recommended intakes are identified for the sulfur-containing amino acids [[methionine]] and [[cysteine]]. There are dietary supplements that provide sulfur, such as [[taurine]] and [[methylsulfonylmethane]].
Minerals are the [[exogenous]] [[chemical element]]s indispensable for life. Four minerals – [[carbon]], [[hydrogen]], [[oxygen]], and [[nitrogen]] – are essential for life but are so ubiquitous in food and drink that these are not considered nutrients and there are no recommended intakes for these as minerals. The need for nitrogen is addressed by requirements set for protein, which is composed of nitrogen-containing amino acids. [[Sulfur]] is essential, but for humans, not identified as having a recommended intake per se. Instead, recommended intakes are identified for the sulfur-containing amino acids [[methionine]] and [[cysteine]]. There are dietary supplements that provide sulfur, such as [[taurine]] and [[methylsulfonylmethane]].


<!--T:13-->
The essential nutrient minerals for humans, listed in order by weight needed to be at the [[Dietary Reference Intake|Recommended Dietary Allowance]] or [[Adequate Intake]] are [[potassium]], [[chlorine]], [[sodium]], [[calcium]], [[phosphorus]], [[magnesium]], [[iron]], [[zinc]], [[manganese]], [[copper]], [[iodine]], [[chromium]], [[molybdenum]], [[selenium]] and [[cobalt]] (the last as a component of vitamin B<sub>12</sub>). There are other minerals which are essential for some plants and animals, but may or may not be essential for humans, such as [[boron]] and [[silicon]]. Essential and purportedly essential minerals are marketed as dietary supplements, individually and in combination with vitamins and other minerals.
The essential nutrient minerals for humans, listed in order by weight needed to be at the [[Dietary Reference Intake|Recommended Dietary Allowance]] or [[Adequate Intake]] are [[potassium]], [[chlorine]], [[sodium]], [[calcium]], [[phosphorus]], [[magnesium]], [[iron]], [[zinc]], [[manganese]], [[copper]], [[iodine]], [[chromium]], [[molybdenum]], [[selenium]] and [[cobalt]] (the last as a component of vitamin B<sub>12</sub>). There are other minerals which are essential for some plants and animals, but may or may not be essential for humans, such as [[boron]] and [[silicon]]. Essential and purportedly essential minerals are marketed as dietary supplements, individually and in combination with vitamins and other minerals.


Although as a general rule, dietary supplement labeling and marketing are not allowed to make disease prevention or treatment claims, the U.S. FDA has for some foods and dietary supplements reviewed the science, concluded that there is significant scientific agreement, and published specifically worded allowed health claims. An initial ruling allowing a health claim for calcium dietary supplements and [[osteoporosis]] was later amended to include calcium supplements with or without vitamin D, effective January 1, 2010. Examples of allowed wording are shown below. In order to qualify for the calcium health claim, a dietary supplement must contain at least 20% of the Reference Dietary Intake, which for calcium means at least 260&nbsp;mg/serving.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2004-P-0205-0006 | title = Food Labeling: Health Claims; Calcium and Osteoporosis, and Calcium, Vitamin D, and Osteoporosis | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration | date = 29 September 2008 }}</ref>
<!--T:14-->
Although as a general rule, dietary supplement labeling and marketing are not allowed to make disease prevention or treatment claims, the U.S. FDA has for some foods and dietary supplements reviewed the science, concluded that there is significant scientific agreement, and published specifically worded allowed health claims. An initial ruling allowing a health claim for calcium dietary supplements and [[osteoporosis]] was later amended to include calcium supplements with or without vitamin D, effective January 1, 2010. Examples of allowed wording are shown below. In order to qualify for the calcium health claim, a dietary supplement must contain at least 20% of the Reference Dietary Intake, which for calcium means at least 260&nbsp;mg/serving.


<!--T:15-->
* "Adequate calcium throughout life, as part of a well-balanced diet, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis."
* "Adequate calcium throughout life, as part of a well-balanced diet, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis."
* "Adequate calcium as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."
* "Adequate calcium as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."
Line 44: Line 62:
* "Adequate calcium and vitamin D as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."
* "Adequate calcium and vitamin D as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."


In the same year, the European Food Safety Authority also approved a dietary supplement health claim for calcium and vitamin D and the reduction of the risk of osteoporotic fractures by reducing bone loss.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1609 | volume=8 | title=Scientific Opinion in relation to the authorisation procedure for health claims on calcium and vitamin D and the reduction of the risk of osteoporotic fractures by reducing bone loss pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 | year=2010 | journal=EFSA Journal | issue=5 | page=1609| doi-access=free }}</ref>
<!--T:16-->
The U.S. FDA also approved Qualified Health Claims (QHCs) for various health conditions for calcium, selenium and [[Chromium(III) picolinate|chromium picolinate]].<ref name=FDA-QHC>{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm072756.htm | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131126045549/https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm072756.htm | archive-date = 26 November 2013 | title = Qualified Health Claims: Letters of Enforcement Discretion | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration | date = }}</ref> QHCs are supported by scientific evidence, but do not meet the more rigorous "significant scientific agreement" standard required for an authorized health claim. If dietary supplement companies choose to make such a claim then the FDA stipulates the exact wording of the QHC to be used on labels and in marketing materials. The wording can be onerous: "One study suggests that selenium intake may reduce the risk of [[bladder cancer]] in women. However, one smaller study showed no reduction in risk. Based on these studies, FDA concludes that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer in women."<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm168527.htm | archive-url = https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171114183712/https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm168527.htm | url-status = dead | archive-date = 2017-11-14 | title = Selenium and a Reduced Risk of Site-specific Cancers | id = FDA-2008-Q-0323 | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration | date = 19 June 2009 }}</ref>
In the same year, the European Food Safety Authority also approved a dietary supplement health claim for calcium and vitamin D and the reduction of the risk of osteoporotic fractures by reducing bone loss.
The U.S. FDA also approved Qualified Health Claims (QHCs) for various health conditions for calcium, selenium and [[Chromium(III) picolinate|chromium picolinate]]. QHCs are supported by scientific evidence, but do not meet the more rigorous "significant scientific agreement" standard required for an authorized health claim. If dietary supplement companies choose to make such a claim then the FDA stipulates the exact wording of the QHC to be used on labels and in marketing materials. The wording can be onerous: "One study suggests that selenium intake may reduce the risk of [[bladder cancer]] in women. However, one smaller study showed no reduction in risk. Based on these studies, FDA concludes that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer in women."


===Proteins and amino acids===
===Proteins and amino acids=== <!--T:17-->
{{main|Protein (nutrient)|Amino acid}}
{{main|Protein (nutrient)|Amino acid}}


Protein-containing supplements, either ready-to-drink or as powders to be mixed into water, are marketed as aids to people recovering from illness or injury, those hoping to thwart the [[sarcopenia]] of old age,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Liao CD, Tsauo JY, Wu YT, Cheng CP, Chen HC, Huang YC, Chen HC, Liou TH | display-authors = 6 | title = Effects of protein supplementation combined with resistance exercise on body composition and physical function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | volume = 106 | issue = 4 | pages = 1078–91 | date=October 2017 | pmid = 28814401 | doi = 10.3945/ajcn.116.143594 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name=Colonetti2017 /> to athletes who believe that strenuous physical activity increases protein requirements,<ref name=IOC/> to people hoping to lose weight while minimizing muscle loss, i.e., conducting a [[protein-sparing modified fast]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Stonehouse W, Wycherley T, Luscombe-Marsh N, Taylor P, Brinkworth G, Riley M | title = Dairy Intake Enhances Body Weight and Composition Changes during Energy Restriction in 18-50-Year-Old Adults-A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | journal = Nutrients | volume = 8 | issue = 7 | pages = 394 | date = July 2016 | pmid = 27376321 | pmc = 4963870 | doi = 10.3390/nu8070394 | doi-access = free }}</ref> and to people who want to increase muscle size for performance and appearance. [[Whey protein]] is a popular ingredient,<ref name=Colonetti2017>{{cite journal | vauthors = Colonetti T, Grande AJ, Milton K, Foster C, Alexandre MC, Uggioni ML, Rosa MI | title = Effects of whey protein supplement in the elderly submitted to resistance training: systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition | volume = 68 | issue = 3 | pages = 257–64 | date = May 2017 | pmid = 27653283 | doi = 10.1080/09637486.2016.1232702 | s2cid = 205659209 | url = https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66111/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Naclerio F, Larumbe-Zabala E | title = Effects of Whey Protein Alone or as Part of a Multi-ingredient Formulation on Strength, Fat-Free Mass, or Lean Body Mass in Resistance-Trained Individuals: A Meta-analysis | journal = Sports Medicine | volume = 46 | issue = 1 | pages = 125–37 | date = January 2016 | pmid = 26403469 | doi = 10.1007/s40279-015-0403-y | s2cid = 31140351 | url = http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/15355/2/15355_Naclerio_Effects%20of%20whey%20protein%20%28AAM%29%202016.pdf }}</ref><ref name=Miller2014>{{cite journal | vauthors = Miller PE, Alexander DD, Perez V | title = Effects of whey protein and resistance exercise on body composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | journal = Journal of the American College of Nutrition | volume = 33 | issue = 2 | pages = 163–75 | year = 2014 | pmid = 24724774 | doi = 10.1080/07315724.2013.875365 | s2cid = 19434136 }}</ref> but products may also incorporate [[casein]], [[Soy protein|soy]], [[Pea protein|pea]], [[Hemp protein|hemp]] or [[rice protein]]. A meta-analysis found a moderate degree of evidence in favor of whey protein supplements use as a safe and effective adjunct to an athlete's training and recovery, including benefits for [[endurance]], average power, [[muscle mass]], and reduced perceived [[exercise intensity]].<ref name="Lam_2019">{{cite journal | vauthors = Lam FC, Bukhsh A, Rehman H, Waqas MK, Shahid N, Khaliel AM, Elhanish A, Karoud M, Telb A, Khan TM | display-authors = 6 | title = Efficacy and Safety of Whey Protein Supplements on Vital Sign and Physical Performance Among Athletes: A Network Meta-Analysis | journal = Frontiers in Pharmacology | volume = 10 | pages = 317 | date = April 2019 | pmid = 31068804 | pmc = 6491698 | doi = 10.3389/fphar.2019.00317 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
<!--T:18-->
Protein-containing supplements, either ready-to-drink or as powders to be mixed into water, are marketed as aids to people recovering from illness or injury, those hoping to thwart the [[sarcopenia]] of old age, to athletes who believe that strenuous physical activity increases protein requirements, to people hoping to lose weight while minimizing muscle loss, i.e., conducting a [[protein-sparing modified fast]], and to people who want to increase muscle size for performance and appearance. [[Whey protein]] is a popular ingredient, but products may also incorporate [[casein]], [[Soy protein|soy]], [[Pea protein|pea]], [[Hemp protein|hemp]] or [[rice protein]]. A meta-analysis found a moderate degree of evidence in favor of whey protein supplements use as a safe and effective adjunct to an athlete's training and recovery, including benefits for [[endurance]], average power, [[muscle mass]], and reduced perceived [[exercise intensity]].


According to US and Canadian [[Dietary Reference Intake]] guidelines, the protein [[Recommended Dietary Allowance]] (RDA) for adults is based on 0.8 grams protein per kilogram body weight. The recommendation is for sedentary and lightly active people.<ref name="DRIProteinChpt">{{cite web | title = Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids| publisher = Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press| year = 2005| url = https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780309085250| doi = 10.17226/10490| isbn = 978-0-309-08525-0| url-access = registration}}</ref><ref name="IJSNEM">{{cite journal | vauthors = Bilsborough S, Mann N | title = A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans | journal = International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism | volume = 16 | issue = 2 | pages = 129–52 | date = April 2006 | pmid = 16779921 | doi = 10.1123/ijsnem.16.2.129 | s2cid = 10339366 }}</ref><ref name=tarnopolsky>{{cite journal | vauthors = Tarnopolsky MA, Atkinson SA, MacDougall JD, Chesley A, Phillips S, Schwarcz HP | title = Evaluation of protein requirements for trained strength athletes | journal = Journal of Applied Physiology | volume = 73 | issue = 5 | pages = 1986–95 | date = November 1992 | pmid = 1474076 | doi = 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.5.1986 | s2cid = 46188182 }}</ref> Scientific reviews can conclude that a high protein diet, when combined with exercise, will increase muscle mass and strength,<ref name=lemon>{{cite journal |last1=Lemon|first1=PW | title=Do athletes need more dietary protein and amino acids? | journal = International Journal of Sport Nutrition | volume = 5 | issue = Suppl | pages = S39-61 | date = June 1995 | pmid = 7550257 | doi = 10.1123/ijsn.5.s1.s39 | s2cid = 27679614 }}</ref><ref name=Morton2017>{{cite journal | vauthors = Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, Schoenfeld BJ, Henselmans M, Helms E, Aragon AA, Devries MC, Banfield L, Krieger JW, Phillips SM | display-authors = 6 | title = A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults | journal = British Journal of Sports Medicine | volume = 52 | issue = 6 | pages = 376–84 | date = March 2018 | pmid = 28698222 | pmc = 5867436 | doi = 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608 }}</ref><!-- defined by transclusion from Bodybuilding supplement --><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Cermak NM, Res PT, de Groot LC, Saris WH, van Loon LJ | title = Protein supplementation augments the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training: a meta-analysis | journal = The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | volume = 96 | issue = 6 | pages = 1454–64 | date = December 2012 | pmid = 23134885 | doi = 10.3945/ajcn.112.037556 | doi-access = free }}</ref> or conclude the opposite.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Finger D, Goltz FR, Umpierre D, Meyer E, Rosa LH, Schneider CD | title = Effects of protein supplementation in older adults undergoing resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = Sports Medicine | volume = 45 | issue = 2 | pages = 245–55 | date = February 2015 | pmid = 25355074 | doi = 10.1007/s40279-014-0269-4 | s2cid = 31362761 }}</ref> The International Olympic Committee recommends protein intake targets for both strength and endurance athletes at about 1.2–1.8 g/kg body mass per day.<ref name=IOC>{{cite web | url = https://hub.olympic.org/athlete365/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/1378_IOC_NutritionAthleteHandbook_1e.pdf | title = Nutrition for Athletes | work = International Olympic Committee | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180122235001/https://hub.olympic.org/athlete365/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/1378_IOC_NutritionAthleteHandbook_1e.pdf | archive-date = 2018-01-22 | author = Nutrition Working Group of the Medical and Scientific Commission of the International Olympic Committee | date = June 2016}}</ref> One review proposed a maximum daily protein intake of approximately 25% of energy requirements, i.e., approximately 2.0 to 2.5 g/kg.<ref name="IJSNEM"/>
<!--T:19-->
According to US and Canadian [[Dietary Reference Intake]] guidelines, the protein [[Recommended Dietary Allowance]] (RDA) for adults is based on 0.8 grams protein per kilogram body weight. The recommendation is for sedentary and lightly active people. Scientific reviews can conclude that a high protein diet, when combined with exercise, will increase muscle mass and strength, or conclude the opposite. The International Olympic Committee recommends protein intake targets for both strength and endurance athletes at about 1.2–1.8 g/kg body mass per day. One review proposed a maximum daily protein intake of approximately 25% of energy requirements, i.e., approximately 2.0 to 2.5 g/kg.


The same protein ingredients marketed as dietary supplements can be incorporated into [[meal replacement]] and [[medical food]] products, but those are regulated and labeled differently from supplements. In the United States, "meal replacement" products are foods and are labeled as such. These typically contain protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins and minerals. There may be content claims such as "good source of protein", "low fat" or "lactose free".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foodprocessing.com/articles/2004/53.html|title=Regulatory Issues: Meal Replacements – Convenience or Compromise?|publisher=Food Processing}}</ref> Medical foods, also nutritionally complete, are designed to be used while a person is under the care of a physician or other licensed healthcare professional.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/MedicalFoods/default.htm | title = Medical Foods Guidance Documents & Regulatory Information | date = 6 December 2017 | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration. }}</ref><ref name = "FDA_FAQ_2016" /> Liquid medical food products – for example, [[Ensure]] – are available in regular and high protein versions.
<!--T:20-->
The same protein ingredients marketed as dietary supplements can be incorporated into [[meal replacement]] and [[medical food]] products, but those are regulated and labeled differently from supplements. In the United States, "meal replacement" products are foods and are labeled as such. These typically contain protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins and minerals. There may be content claims such as "good source of protein", "low fat" or "lactose free". Medical foods, also nutritionally complete, are designed to be used while a person is under the care of a physician or other licensed healthcare professional. Liquid medical food products – for example, [[Ensure]] – are available in regular and high protein versions.


Proteins are chains of [[amino acid]]s. Nine of these proteinogenic amino acids are considered essential for humans because they cannot be produced from other compounds by the human body and so must be taken in as food. Recommended intakes, expressed as milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day, have been established.<ref name="DRIProteinChpt"/> Other amino acids may be conditionally essential for certain ages or medical conditions. Amino acids, individually and in combinations, are sold as dietary supplements. The claim for supplementing with the [[branched chain amino acid]]s leucine, valine and isoleucine is for stimulating muscle protein synthesis. A review of the literature concluded this claim was unwarranted.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Charles EJ, Johnston LE, Herbert MA, Mehaffey JH, Yount KW, Likosky DS, Theurer PF, Fonner CE, Rich JB, Speir AM, Ailawadi G, Prager RL, Kron IL | display-authors = 6 | title = Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Cardiac Surgery Volume and Outcomes | journal = The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | volume = 104 | issue = 4 | pages = 1251–58 | date = October 2017 | pmid = 28552372 | pmc = 5610068 | doi = 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.079 }}</ref> In elderly people, supplementation with just [[leucine]] resulted in a modest (0.99&nbsp;kg) increase in lean body mass.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Komar B, Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G | title = Effects of leucine-rich protein supplements on anthropometric parameter and muscle strength in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging | volume = 19 | issue = 4 | pages = 437–46 | date = April 2015 | pmid = 25809808 | doi = 10.1007/s12603-014-0559-4 | s2cid = 24759289 }}</ref> The non-essential amino acid [[arginine]], consumed in sufficient amounts, is thought to act as a donor for the synthesis of nitric oxide, a vasodilator. A review confirmed blood pressure lowering.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Dong JY, Qin LQ, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Wang J, Arigoni F, Zhang W | title = Effect of oral L-arginine supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials | journal = American Heart Journal | volume = 162 | issue = 6 | pages = 959–65 | date = December 2011 | pmid = 22137067 | doi = 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.012 }}</ref> [[Taurine]], a popular dietary supplement ingredient with claims made for sports performance, is technically not an amino acid. It is synthesized in the body from the amino acid [[cysteine]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/amino-acid|title=the definition of amino acid|website=Dictionary.com|access-date=2017-02-22}}</ref>
<!--T:21-->
Proteins are chains of [[amino acid]]s. Nine of these proteinogenic amino acids are considered essential for humans because they cannot be produced from other compounds by the human body and so must be taken in as food. Recommended intakes, expressed as milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day, have been established. Other amino acids may be conditionally essential for certain ages or medical conditions. Amino acids, individually and in combinations, are sold as dietary supplements. The claim for supplementing with the [[branched chain amino acid]]s leucine, valine and isoleucine is for stimulating muscle protein synthesis. A review of the literature concluded this claim was unwarranted. In elderly people, supplementation with just [[leucine]] resulted in a modest (0.99&nbsp;kg) increase in lean body mass. The non-essential amino acid [[arginine]], consumed in sufficient amounts, is thought to act as a donor for the synthesis of nitric oxide, a vasodilator. A review confirmed blood pressure lowering. [[Taurine]], a popular dietary supplement ingredient with claims made for sports performance, is technically not an amino acid. It is synthesized in the body from the amino acid [[cysteine]].


===Bodybuilding supplements===
===Bodybuilding supplements=== <!--T:22-->
{{Excerpt|Bodybuilding supplement}}
{{Excerpt|Bodybuilding supplement|paragraph=2-3}}


===Essential fatty acids===
===Essential fatty acids=== <!--T:23-->
{{main|Essential fatty acids}}
{{main|Essential fatty acids}}
Fish oil is a commonly used fatty acid supplement because it is a source of [[omega-3 fatty acid]]s.<ref name="NIH">{{cite web|url=http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Omega3FattyAcids-HealthProfessional/|publisher=US National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements|title=Omega−3 Fatty Acids and Health: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals|date=2 November 2016|access-date=5 April 2017}}</ref> Fatty acids are strings of carbon atoms, having a range of lengths. If links are all single (C-C), then the fatty acid is called ''[[saturated fat|saturated]]''; with one double bond (C=C), it is called ''[[monounsaturated fat|monounsaturated]]''; if there are two or more double bonds (C=C=C), it is called ''[[polyunsaturated fat|polyunsaturated]]''. Only two fatty acids, both polyunsaturated, are considered essential to be obtained from the diet, as the others are synthesized in the body. The "essential" fatty acids are [[alpha-linolenic acid]] (ALA), an omega-3 fatty acid, and [[linoleic acid]] (LA), an [[omega-6 fatty acid]].<ref name=NIH/><ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Whitney E, Rolfes SR | chapter = Chapter 5: The Lipids: Triglyerides, Phospholipids, and Sterols | title = Understanding Nutrition | edition = 11th | location = California | publisher = Thomson Wadsworth | year = 2008 | pages = 154 | isbn = 978-0-495-11669-1 }}</ref> ALA can be elongated in the body to create other omega-3 fatty acids: [[eicosapentaenoic acid]] (EPA) and [[docosahexaenoic acid]] (DHA).
Fish oil is a commonly used fatty acid supplement because it is a source of [[omega-3 fatty acid]]s. Fatty acids are strings of carbon atoms, having a range of lengths. If links are all single (C-C), then the fatty acid is called ''[[saturated fat|saturated]]''; with one double bond (C=C), it is called ''[[monounsaturated fat|monounsaturated]]''; if there are two or more double bonds (C=C=C), it is called ''[[polyunsaturated fat|polyunsaturated]]''. Only two fatty acids, both polyunsaturated, are considered essential to be obtained from the diet, as the others are synthesized in the body. The "essential" fatty acids are [[alpha-linolenic acid]] (ALA), an omega-3 fatty acid, and [[linoleic acid]] (LA), an [[omega-6 fatty acid]]. ALA can be elongated in the body to create other omega-3 fatty acids: [[eicosapentaenoic acid]] (EPA) and [[docosahexaenoic acid]] (DHA).


Plant oils, particularly seed and nut oils, contain ALA.<ref name=NIH/> Food sources of EPA and DHA are oceanic fish, whereas dietary supplement sources include fish oil, krill oil and [[marine algae]] extracts. The [[European Food Safety Authority]] (EFSA) identifies 250&nbsp;mg/day for a combined total of EPA and DHA as Adequate Intake, with a recommendation that women pregnant or lactating consume an additional 100 to 200&nbsp;mg/day of DHA.<ref name=EFSA-Recommended>{{cite web |title=Overview on Dietary Reference Values for the EU population as derived by the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies |year=2017 |url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/DRV_Summary_tables_jan_17.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828082247/https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/DRV_Summary_tables_jan_17.pdf |archive-date=August 28, 2017 |df=mdy-all}}</ref> In the United States and Canada are [[Adequate Intake]]s for ALA and LA over various stages of life, but there are no intake levels specified for EPA and/or DHA.<ref name=DRITable>{{cite web | url = http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Nutrition/DRI-Tables/5Summary%20TableTables%2014.pdf?la=en | title = Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180911225459/http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Nutrition/DRI-Tables/5Summary%20TableTables%2014.pdf?la=en | archive-date=2018-09-11 | author = Food and Nutrition Board | publisher = Institute of Medicine, National Academies }}</ref>
<!--T:24-->
Plant oils, particularly seed and nut oils, contain ALA. Food sources of EPA and DHA are oceanic fish, whereas dietary supplement sources include fish oil, krill oil and [[marine algae]] extracts. The [[European Food Safety Authority]] (EFSA) identifies 250&nbsp;mg/day for a combined total of EPA and DHA as Adequate Intake, with a recommendation that women pregnant or lactating consume an additional 100 to 200&nbsp;mg/day of DHA. In the United States and Canada are [[Adequate Intake]]s for ALA and LA over various stages of life, but there are no intake levels specified for EPA and/or DHA.


Supplementation with EPA and/or DHA does not appear to affect the risk of death, cancer or heart disease.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rizos EC, Elisaf MS | title = Does Supplementation with Omega-3 PUFAs Add to the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease? | journal = Current Cardiology Reports | volume = 19 | issue = 6 | pages = 47 | date = June 2017 | pmid = 28432658 | doi = 10.1007/s11886-017-0856-8 | s2cid = 23585060 }}</ref><ref name=Mac2006>{{cite journal | vauthors = MacLean CH, Newberry SJ, Mojica WA, Khanna P, Issa AM, Suttorp MJ, Lim YW, Traina SB, Hilton L, Garland R, Morton SC | display-authors = 6 | title = Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cancer risk: a systematic review | journal = JAMA | volume = 295 | issue = 4 | pages = 403–15 | date = January 2006 | pmid = 16434631 | doi = 10.1001/jama.295.4.403 | hdl-access = free | hdl = 10919/79706 }}</ref> Furthermore, studies of fish oil supplements have failed to support claims of preventing [[Myocardial infarction|heart attacks]] or [[stroke]]s.<ref name="JAMA-201403">{{cite journal | vauthors = Grey A, Bolland M | title = Clinical trial evidence and use of fish oil supplements | journal = JAMA Internal Medicine | volume = 174 | issue = 3 | pages = 460–2 | date = March 2014 | pmid = 24352849 | doi = 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12765 | doi-access = free }}</ref> In 2017, the American Heart Association issued a science advisory stating that it could not recommend use of omega-3 fish oil supplements for primary prevention of [[cardiovascular disease]] or stroke, although it reaffirmed supplementation for people who have a history of [[coronary heart disease]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Siscovick DS, Barringer TA, Fretts AM, Wu JH, Lichtenstein AH, Costello RB, Kris-Etherton PM, Jacobson TA, Engler MB, Alger HM, Appel LJ, Mozaffarian D | display-authors = 6 | title = Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid (Fish Oil) Supplementation and the Prevention of Clinical Cardiovascular Disease: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association | journal = Circulation | volume = 135 | issue = 15 | pages = e867–e884 | date = April 2017 | pmid = 28289069 | pmc = 6903779 | doi = 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000482 }}</ref>
<!--T:25-->
Supplementation with EPA and/or DHA does not appear to affect the risk of death, cancer or heart disease. Furthermore, studies of fish oil supplements have failed to support claims of preventing [[Myocardial infarction|heart attacks]] or [[stroke]]s. In 2017, the American Heart Association issued a science advisory stating that it could not recommend use of omega-3 fish oil supplements for primary prevention of [[cardiovascular disease]] or stroke, although it reaffirmed supplementation for people who have a history of [[coronary heart disease]].


Manufacturers have begun to include long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids DHA and [[arachidonic acid]] (AA) into their formula milk for newborns, however, a 2017 review found that supplementation with DHA and AA does not appear to be harmful or beneficial to formula-fed infants.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Jasani B, Simmer K, Patole SK, Rao SC | title = Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2017 | pages = CD000376 | date = March 2017 | issue = 3 | pmid = 28281303 | pmc = 6464574 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD000376.pub4 | collaboration = Cochrane Neonatal Group }}</ref>
<!--T:26-->
Manufacturers have begun to include long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids DHA and [[arachidonic acid]] (AA) into their formula milk for newborns, however, a 2017 review found that supplementation with DHA and AA does not appear to be harmful or beneficial to formula-fed infants.


===Natural products===
===Natural products=== <!--T:27-->
{{Main|Natural product}}
{{Main|Natural product}}
{{See also|Phytochemical|Herbalism|Traditional Chinese medicine}}
{{See also|Phytochemical|Herbalism|Traditional Chinese medicine}}
[[File:Springtime St. John's Wort (12610079565).jpg|thumb|St. John's wort petals used in natural product supplements]]
[[File:Springtime St. John's Wort (12610079565).jpg|thumb|St. John's wort petals used in natural product supplements]]


Dietary supplements can be manufactured using intact sources or [[extract]]s from plants, animals, algae, fungi or lichens, including such examples as [[ginkgo biloba]], [[curcumin]], [[cranberry]], [[St. John's wort]], [[ginseng]], [[resveratrol]], [[glucosamine]] and [[collagen]].<ref name="efsa18">{{cite web|title=Botanicals|url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/botanicals|publisher=European Food Safety Authority|access-date=1 February 2018|date=2018}}</ref><ref name="prince">{{cite web| vauthors = Prince J |title=U.S. Herbal Supplement Sales Up 7.7% in 2016|url=http://www.nutritionaloutlook.com/herbs-botanicals/us-herbal-supplement-sales-77-2016|publisher=Nutritional Outlook|access-date=1 February 2018|date=13 September 2017}}</ref><ref name="canada">{{cite web|title=Natural and Non-prescription Health Products|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/natural-non-prescription.html|publisher=Government of Canada|access-date=1 February 2018|date=2018}}</ref> Products bearing promotional claims of health benefits are sold without requiring a prescription in [[pharmacy|pharmacies]], [[supermarket]]s, specialist shops, military [[commissary|commissaries]], [[buyers club]]s, [[direct selling]] organizations, and the internet.<ref name=prince/> While most of these products have a long history of use in [[herbalism]] and various forms of traditional medicine, concerns exist about their actual efficacy, safety and consistency of quality.<ref name="quackwatch">{{cite web|url=https://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/herbs.html|title=The herbal minefield|vauthors=Barrett S|publisher=Quackwatch|date=23 November 2013|access-date=1 February 2018|archive-date=18 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180818071259/http://quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/herbs.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="zhang">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhang J, Wider B, Shang H, Li X, Ernst E | title = Quality of herbal medicines: challenges and solutions | journal = Complementary Therapies in Medicine | volume = 20 | issue = 1–2 | pages = 100–6 | year = 2012 | pmid = 22305255 | doi = 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.09.004 }}</ref><ref name="coghlan">{{cite journal | vauthors = Coghlan ML, Haile J, Houston J, Murray DC, White NE, Moolhuijzen P, Bellgard MI, Bunce M | display-authors = 6 | title = Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns | journal = PLOS Genetics | volume = 8 | issue = 4 | pages = e1002657 | year = 2012 | pmid = 22511890 | pmc = 3325194 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002657 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Canada has published a manufacturer and consumer guide describing quality, licensing, standards, identities, and common contaminants of natural products.<ref name="canada-guide">{{cite web|title=Quality of Natural Health Products Guide|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/natural-non-prescription/legislation-guidelines/guidance-documents/quality-guide.html|publisher=Government of Canada|access-date=1 February 2018|date=1 May 2015}}</ref>
<!--T:28-->
Dietary supplements can be manufactured using intact sources or [[extract]]s from plants, animals, algae, fungi or lichens, including such examples as [[ginkgo biloba]], [[curcumin]], [[cranberry]], [[St. John's wort]], [[ginseng]], [[resveratrol]], [[glucosamine]] and [[collagen]]. Products bearing promotional claims of health benefits are sold without requiring a prescription in [[pharmacy|pharmacies]], [[supermarket]]s, specialist shops, military [[commissary|commissaries]], [[buyers club]]s, [[direct selling]] organizations, and the internet. While most of these products have a long history of use in [[herbalism]] and various forms of traditional medicine, concerns exist about their actual efficacy, safety and consistency of quality. Canada has published a manufacturer and consumer guide describing quality, licensing, standards, identities, and common contaminants of natural products.


In 2019, sales of herbal supplements just in the United States alone were $9.6 billion, with the market growing at approximately 8.6% per year,<ref>{{cite web|title=US Sales of Herbal Supplements Increase by 8.6% in 2019 - American Botanical Council|url=https://www.herbalgram.org/resources/herbalgram/issues/127/table-of-contents/herbalgram-127-herb-market-report-american-botanical-council/|access-date=2021-07-30|website=www.herbalgram.org}}</ref> with [[cannabidiol]] and mushroom product sales as the highest.<ref name="nw">{{cite web |title=Herbal Supplements Post Strongest Sales Growth in Two Decades |url=https://www.nutraceuticalsworld.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2019-09-23/herbal-supplements-post-strongest-sales-growth-in-two-decades |publisher=Nutraceuticals World |access-date=25 September 2019 |date=23 September 2019}}</ref> Italy, Germany, and [[Eastern Europe]]an countries were leading consumers of botanical supplements in 2016, with [[European Union]] market growth forecast to be $8.7 billion by 2020.<ref name="becker">{{cite web| vauthors = Becker M |title=Dietary Supplements in Europe Poised for Profound Growth|url=https://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/blogs/supplement-perspectives/2016/03/dietary-supplements-in-europe-poised-for-profound.aspx|publisher=Natural Products Insider|access-date=1 February 2018|date=8 March 2016}}</ref>
<!--T:29-->
In 2019, sales of herbal supplements just in the United States alone were $9.6 billion, with the market growing at approximately 8.6% per year, with [[cannabidiol]] and mushroom product sales as the highest. Italy, Germany, and [[Eastern Europe]]an countries were leading consumers of botanical supplements in 2016, with [[European Union]] market growth forecast to be $8.7 billion by 2020.


===Probiotics===
===Probiotics=== <!--T:30-->
{{Main|Probiotic}}
{{Main|Probiotic}}
Claimed benefits of using [[probiotic]] supplements are not supported by sufficient clinical evidence.<ref>{{cite web|title=Probiotic Health Claims |url=https://www.fsai.ie/faq/probiotic_health_claims.html|publisher=Food Safety Authority of Ireland|access-date=4 February 2018|date=5 May 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rijkers GT, de Vos WM, Brummer RJ, Morelli L, Corthier G, Marteau P | title = Health benefits and health claims of probiotics: bridging science and marketing | journal = The British Journal of Nutrition | volume = 106 | issue = 9 | pages = 1291–6 | date = November 2011 | pmid = 21861940 | doi = 10.1017/S000711451100287X | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Slashinski MJ, McCurdy SA, Achenbaum LS, Whitney SN, McGuire AL | title = "Snake-oil," "quack medicine," and "industrially cultured organisms:" biovalue and the commercialization of human microbiome research | journal = BMC Medical Ethics | volume = 13 | pages=28 | date=October 2012 | pmid = 23110633 | pmc = 3512494 | doi = 10.1186/1472-6939-13-28 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Meta-analysis studies have reported a modest reduction of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and acute diarrhea in children taking probiotics.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Guo Q, Goldenberg JZ, Humphrey C, El Dib R, Johnston BC | title = Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 4 | pages = CD004827 | date = April 2019 | issue = 4 | pmid = 31039287 | pmc = 6490796 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub5 | collaboration = Cochrane IBD Group }}</ref> There is limited evidence in support of adults using mono-strain and multi-strain containing probiotics for the alleviation of symptoms associated with [[irritable bowel syndrome]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Dale|first1=HF|last2=Rasmussen|first2=SH|last3=Asiller|first3=ÖÖ|last4=Lied|first4=GA |date=September 2019|title=Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review|journal=Nutrients|volume=11|issue=9|pages=2048|doi=10.3390/nu11092048|pmid=31480656|issn=2072-6643|pmc=6769995|doi-access=free}}</ref> Probiotic supplements are generally regarded as safe.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=Doron S, Snydman DR | title=Risk and safety of probiotics | journal=Clinical Infectious Diseases | volume=60 | issue=Suppl 2 | pages=S129-34 | date=May 2015 | pmid=25922398 | pmc=4490230 | doi=10.1093/cid/civ085}}</ref>
Claimed benefits of using [[probiotic]] supplements are not supported by sufficient clinical evidence. Meta-analysis studies have reported a modest reduction of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and acute diarrhea in children taking probiotics. There is limited evidence in support of adults using mono-strain and multi-strain containing probiotics for the alleviation of symptoms associated with [[irritable bowel syndrome]]. Probiotic supplements are generally regarded as safe.


=== Fertility ===
=== Fertility === <!--T:31-->
{{Main articles|Fertility}}
{{Main articles|Fertility}}
A meta-analysis provided preliminary evidence that men treated with supplements containing [[selenium in biology|selenium]], [[zinc]], [[omega-3 fatty acid]]s, [[coenzyme Q10|coenzyme Q<sub>10</sub>]] or [[carnitine]]s reported improvements in total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Salas-Huetos A, Rosique-Esteban N, Becerra-Tomás N, Vizmanos B, Bulló M, Salas-Salvadó J | title = The Effect of Nutrients and Dietary Supplements on Sperm Quality Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials | journal = Advances in Nutrition | volume = 9 | issue = 6 | pages = 833–848 | date = November 2018 | pmid = 30462179 | doi = 10.1093/advances/nmy057 | pmc = 6247182 }}</ref> A review concluded that omega-3 taken through supplements and diet might improve semen quality in infertile men.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Falsig AL, Gleerup CS, Knudsen UB | title = The influence of omega-3 fatty acids on semen quality markers: a systematic PRISMA review | journal = Andrology | volume = 7 | issue = 6 | pages = 794–803 | date = November 2019 | pmid = 31116515 | doi = 10.1111/andr.12649 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A 2021 review also supported selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q<sub>10</sub> or carnitines, but warned that "excessive use of antioxidants may be detrimental to the spermatic function and many of the over-the-counter supplements are not scientifically proven to improve fertility."<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Torres-Arce E, Vizmanos B, Babio N, Márquez-Sandoval F, Salas-Huetos A | title = Dietary Antioxidants in the Treatment of Male Infertility: Counteracting Oxidative Stress | journal = Biology | volume = 10 | issue = 3 | pages = 241 | date = March 2021 | pmid = 33804600 | pmc = 8003818 | doi = 10.3390/biology10030241 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
A meta-analysis provided preliminary evidence that men treated with supplements containing [[selenium in biology|selenium]], [[zinc]], [[omega-3 fatty acid]]s, [[coenzyme Q10|coenzyme Q<sub>10</sub>]] or [[carnitine]]s reported improvements in total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology. A review concluded that omega-3 taken through supplements and diet might improve semen quality in infertile men. A 2021 review also supported selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q<sub>10</sub> or carnitines, but warned that "excessive use of antioxidants may be detrimental to the spermatic function and many of the over-the-counter supplements are not scientifically proven to improve fertility."


There is low quality and insufficient evidence for the use of oral antioxidant supplements as a viable treatment for [[subfertile]] woman.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Showell MG, Mackenzie-Proctor R, Jordan V, Hart RJ | title = Antioxidants for female subfertility | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 8 | pages = CD007807 | date = August 2020 | issue = 11 | pmid = 32851663 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub4 | collaboration = Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group | pmc = 8094745 }}</ref> A review provided evidence that taking [[Dehydroepiandrosterone (dietary supplement)|dehydroepiandrosterone]] before starting an ''in vitro'' fertilization series may increase pregnancy rates and decrease miscarriage likelihood.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Schwarze JE, Canales J, Crosby J, Ortega-Hrepich C, Villa S, Pommer R | title = DHEA use to improve likelihood of IVF/ICSI success in patients with diminished ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = JBRA Assisted Reproduction | volume = 22 | issue = 4 | pages = 369–374 | date = November 2018 | pmid = 30125071 | pmc = 6210617 | doi = 10.5935/1518-0557.20180046 }}</ref>
<!--T:32-->
There is low quality and insufficient evidence for the use of oral antioxidant supplements as a viable treatment for [[subfertile]] woman. A review provided evidence that taking [[Dehydroepiandrosterone (dietary supplement)|dehydroepiandrosterone]] before starting an ''in vitro'' fertilization series may increase pregnancy rates and decrease miscarriage likelihood.


=== Prenatal ===
=== Prenatal === <!--T:33-->
{{Main articles|Prenatal vitamins}}
{{Main articles|Prenatal vitamins}}
[[Prenatal vitamins]] are dietary supplements commonly given to pregnant women to supply nutrients that may reduce health complications for the mother and [[fetus]]. Although prenatal vitamins are not meant to substitute for dietary nutrition, prenatal supplementation may be beneficial for pregnant women at risk of nutrient deficiencies because of diet limitations or restrictions. The most common components in prenatal vitamins include vitamins [[Vitamin B6|B<sub>6</sub>]], [[folate]], [[Vitamin B12|B<sub>12</sub>]], [[Vitamin C|C]], [[Vitamin D|D]], [[Vitamin E|E]], [[Iron supplement|iron]] and [[calcium]].<ref name="Brown_2020">{{cite journal | vauthors = Brown B, Wright C | title = Safety and efficacy of supplements in pregnancy | journal = Nutrition Reviews | volume = 78 | issue = 10 | pages = 813–826 | date = October 2020 | pmid = 31925443 | pmc = 7558284 | doi = 10.1093/nutrit/nuz101 }}</ref>
[[Prenatal vitamins]] are dietary supplements commonly given to pregnant women to supply nutrients that may reduce health complications for the mother and [[fetus]]. Although prenatal vitamins are not meant to substitute for dietary nutrition, prenatal supplementation may be beneficial for pregnant women at risk of nutrient deficiencies because of diet limitations or restrictions. The most common components in prenatal vitamins include vitamins [[Vitamin B6|B<sub>6</sub>]], [[folate]], [[Vitamin B12|B<sub>12</sub>]], [[Vitamin C|C]], [[Vitamin D|D]], [[Vitamin E|E]], [[Iron supplement|iron]] and [[calcium]].


Sufficient intake of vitamin B<sub>6</sub> can lower the risk of early pregnancy loss and relieve symptoms of [[morning sickness]].<ref name="deregil">{{cite journal | vauthors = De-Regil LM, Peña-Rosas JP, Fernández-Gaxiola AC, Rayco-Solon P | title = Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 12 | pages = CD007950 | date = December 2015 | volume = 2015 | pmid = 26662928 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3 | pmc = 8783750 | collaboration = Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Matthews A, Haas DM, O'Mathúna DP, Dowswell T | title = Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2015 | issue = 9 | pages = CD007575 | date = September 2015 | pmid = 26348534 | pmc = 7196889 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD007575.pub4 | collaboration = Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group }}</ref> Folate is also an essential nutrient for pregnant women to prevent [[neural tube defect]]s.<ref name=deregil/> In 2006, the World Health Organization endorsed the recommendation for women of child-bearing age to consume 400 [[microgram]]s of folate through the diet daily if planning a pregnancy.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = McStay CL, Prescott SL, Bower C, Palmer DJ | title = Maternal Folic Acid Supplementation during Pregnancy and Childhood Allergic Disease Outcomes: A Question of Timing? | journal = Nutrients | volume = 9 | issue = 2 | pages = 123 | date = February 2017 | pmid = 28208798 | pmc = 5331554 | doi = 10.3390/nu9020123 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A 2013 review found folic acid supplementation during pregnancy did not affect the mother's health other than a risk reduction on low pre-delivery serum folate and megaloblastic anemia.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lassi ZS, Salam RA, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA | title = Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy for maternal health and pregnancy outcomes | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 3 | pages = CD006896 | date = March 2013 | volume = 2013 | pmid = 23543547 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.cd006896.pub2 | pmc = 10069458 }}</ref> There is little evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation improves prenatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders and [[gestational diabetes]].<ref name="pmid31581312">{{cite journal | vauthors = Palacios C, Trak-Fellermeier MA, Martinez RX, Lopez-Perez L, Lips P, Salisi JA, John JC, Peña-Rosas JP | display-authors = 6 | title = Regimens of vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2019 | issue = 10| pages = CD013446 | date = October 2019 | pmid = 31581312 | pmc = 6776191 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD013446 | url = }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=WHO {{!}} Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy |url=http://www.who.int/elena/titles/vitamind_supp_pregnancy/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140330091855/http://www.who.int/elena/titles/vitamind_supp_pregnancy/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 30, 2014|access-date=2021-07-30|website=WHO}}</ref> Evidence does not support the routine use of vitamin E supplementation during pregnancy to prevent adverse events, such as preterm birth, fetal or neonatal death, or maternal hypertensive disorders.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rumbold A, Ota E, Hori H, Miyazaki C, Crowther CA | title = Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 9 | pages = CD004069 | date = September 2015 | volume = 2016 | pmid = 26343254 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD004069.pub3 | pmc = 8406700 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=WHO {{!}} Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy|url=http://www.who.int/elena/titles/review_summaries/vitaminE-pregnancy/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210730225711/https://www.who.int/elena/titles/review_summaries/vitaminE-pregnancy/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 30, 2021|access-date=2021-07-30|website=WHO}}</ref>
<!--T:34-->
Sufficient intake of vitamin B<sub>6</sub> can lower the risk of early pregnancy loss and relieve symptoms of [[morning sickness]]. Folate is also an essential nutrient for pregnant women to prevent [[neural tube defect]]s. In 2006, the World Health Organization endorsed the recommendation for women of child-bearing age to consume 400 [[microgram]]s of folate through the diet daily if planning a pregnancy. A 2013 review found folic acid supplementation during pregnancy did not affect the mother's health other than a risk reduction on low pre-delivery serum folate and megaloblastic anemia. There is little evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation improves prenatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders and [[gestational diabetes]]. Evidence does not support the routine use of vitamin E supplementation during pregnancy to prevent adverse events, such as preterm birth, fetal or neonatal death, or maternal hypertensive disorders.


Iron supplementation can lower the risk of [[Iron-deficiency anemia|iron deficiency anemia]] for pregnant women.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Peña-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Garcia-Casal MN, Dowswell T | title = Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 7 | pages = CD004736 | date = July 2015 | volume = 2015 | pmid = 26198451 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5 | pmc = 8918165 | collaboration = Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group }}</ref> In 2020, the World Health Organization updated recommendations for adequate calcium levels during pregnancy to prevent [[Hypertensive disease of pregnancy|hypertensive disorders]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Hofmeyr GJ, Manyame S, Medley N, Williams MJ | title = Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2019 | pages = CD011192 | date = September 2019 | issue = 9 | pmid = 31523806 | pmc = 6745517 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD011192.pub3 | collaboration = Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=WHO {{!}} Calcium supplementation during pregnancy to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia |url=http://www.who.int/elena/titles/guidance_summaries/calcium_pregnancy/en/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150102183304/http://www.who.int/elena/titles/guidance_summaries/calcium_pregnancy/en/|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 2, 2015|access-date=2021-07-30|website=WHO}}</ref>
<!--T:35-->
Iron supplementation can lower the risk of [[Iron-deficiency anemia|iron deficiency anemia]] for pregnant women. In 2020, the World Health Organization updated recommendations for adequate calcium levels during pregnancy to prevent [[Hypertensive disease of pregnancy|hypertensive disorders]].


=== Pharmacotherapy ===
=== Pharmacotherapy === <!--T:36-->
Individuals with [[hypokalemic sensory overstimulation]] are sometimes diagnosed as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), raising the possibility that a subtype of ADHD has a cause that can be understood mechanistically and treated in a novel way. The sensory overload is treatable with oral [[potassium gluconate]].
Individuals with [[hypokalemic sensory overstimulation]] are sometimes diagnosed as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), raising the possibility that a subtype of ADHD has a cause that can be understood mechanistically and treated in a novel way. The sensory overload is treatable with oral [[potassium gluconate]].


==Industry==
==Industry== <!--T:37-->
In 2020, the American market for dietary supplements was valued at $140.3 billion,<ref name="GVW_Report" /> with the [[Economic impact analysis|economic impact]] in the United States for 2016 estimated at $122 billion, including employment wages and taxes.<ref>{{cite web|title=Supplement Industry Contributes $122 Billion To U.S. Economy|url=https://www.nutraceuticalsworld.com/contents/view_online-exclusives/2016-06-10/supplement-industry-contributes-122-billion-to-us-economy|publisher=Nutraceuticals World|access-date=1 February 2018|date=10 June 2016}}</ref> A 2020 analysis projected that the global market for [[vitamin]]s and dietary supplement products would reach $196.6 billion by 2028, where the growth in [[Market (economics)|market size]] is largely attributed to recent technological advancements in product manufacturing, increased demand for products advertised as healthy, increased product availability, and [[Population ageing|population aging]].<ref>{{cite web|date=2021|title=Vitamins and Supplements Market Size & Industry Report [2028]|url=https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/vitamins-and-supplements-market-104051|access-date=2021-07-30|website=www.fortunebusinessinsights.com}}</ref>
In 2020, the American market for dietary supplements was valued at $140.3 billion, with the [[Economic impact analysis|economic impact]] in the United States for 2016 estimated at $122 billion, including employment wages and taxes. A 2020 analysis projected that the global market for [[vitamin]]s and dietary supplement products would reach $196.6 billion by 2028, where the growth in [[Market (economics)|market size]] is largely attributed to recent technological advancements in product manufacturing, increased demand for products advertised as healthy, increased product availability, and [[Population ageing|population aging]].


==Adulteration, contamination and mislabeling==
==Adulteration, contamination and mislabeling== <!--T:38-->
Over the period 2008 to 2011, the [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) of the United States received 6,307 reports of health problems (identified as [[adverse event]]s) from use of dietary supplements containing a combination of ingredients in manufactured vitamins, minerals or other supplement products,<ref name="gao">{{cite report|title=Dietary Supplements: FDA May Have Opportunities to Expand Its Use of Reported Health Problems to Oversee Products|issue=GAO-13-244|url=https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-244|publisher=Government Accountability Office, US Government|access-date=2 February 2018|date=18 March 2013 | author = U. S. Government Accountability Office }}</ref> with 92% of tested herbal supplements containing [[lead]] and 80% containing other chemical contaminants.<ref name="harmon">{{cite magazine| last1=Harmon|first1=K |title=Herbal Supplement Sellers Dispense Dangerous Advice, False Claims|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/herbal-supplement-dangers/|magazine=Scientific American|access-date=2 February 2018|date=28 May 2010}}</ref> Using [[undercover operation|undercover]] staff, the GAO also found that supplement retailers intentionally engaged in "unequivocal deception" to sell products advertised with baseless health claims, particularly to elderly consumers.<ref name=harmon/> [[Consumer Reports]] also reported unsafe levels of [[arsenic]], [[cadmium]], lead and [[mercury (element)|mercury]] in several protein powder products.<ref name="MyUser_Theglobeandmail.com_December_11_2015c">{{cite news |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/conditions/are-protein-shakes-the-weight-loss-magic-bullet/article596648/ |title=Are protein shakes the weight-loss magic bullet?| vauthors = McGinn D |publisher=The Globe and Mail (Toronto)|date= 26 March 2017 |access-date=2 February 2018}}</ref> The [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]] (CBC) reported that protein spiking, i.e., the addition of amino acids to manipulate protein content analysis, was common.<ref name="cbc">{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/marketplace-protein-powders-1.3313084 |title=Marketplace: Some protein powders fail fitness test|publisher= [[CBC News]] | vauthors = Griffith-Greene M |date= November 13, 2015 |access-date= December 11, 2015}}</ref> Many of the companies involved challenged CBC's claim.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/blog/supplements-company-statements |title=Supplements: Company statements|publisher= [[CBC News]] |date= November 13, 2015  |access-date= December 11, 2015}}</ref>
Over the period 2008 to 2011, the [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) of the United States received 6,307 reports of health problems (identified as [[adverse event]]s) from use of dietary supplements containing a combination of ingredients in manufactured vitamins, minerals or other supplement products, with 92% of tested herbal supplements containing [[lead]] and 80% containing other chemical contaminants. Using [[undercover operation|undercover]] staff, the GAO also found that supplement retailers intentionally engaged in "unequivocal deception" to sell products advertised with baseless health claims, particularly to elderly consumers. [[Consumer Reports]] also reported unsafe levels of [[arsenic]], [[cadmium]], lead and [[mercury (element)|mercury]] in several protein powder products. The [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]] (CBC) reported that protein spiking, i.e., the addition of amino acids to manipulate protein content analysis, was common. Many of the companies involved challenged CBC's claim.


A 2013 study on herbal supplements found that many products were of low quality, one third did not contain the active ingredient(s) claimed, and one third contained unlisted substances.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S | title = DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products | journal = BMC Medicine | volume = 11 | pages = 222 | date = October 2013 | pmid = 24120035 | pmc = 3851815 | doi = 10.1186/1741-7015-11-222 | doi-access = free }}</ref> In a [[Genetics|genetic]] analysis of herbal supplements, 78% of samples contained animal [[DNA]] that was not identified as an ingredient on the product labels.<ref name=zhang/> In some botanical products, undeclared ingredients were used to increase the bulk of the product and reduce its cost of manufacturing, while potentially violating certain religious and/or cultural limitations on consuming animal ingredients, such as cow, buffalo or deer.<ref name=zhang/> In 2015, the [[New York Attorney General]] (NY-AG) identified four major retailers with dietary supplement products that contained fraudulent and potentially dangerous ingredients, requiring the companies to remove the products from retail stores.<ref name="oconnor">{{cite news| vauthors = O'Connor A |title=New York Attorney General Targets Supplements at Major Retailers|url=https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/new-york-attorney-general-targets-supplements-at-major-retailers/|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=1 February 2018|date=3 February 2015}}</ref> According to the NY-AG, only about 20% of the herbal supplements tested contained the plants claimed.<ref name="oconnor"/> The methodology used by the NY-AG was disputed. The test involves looking for [[DNA]] fragments from the plants named as the dietary supplement ingredients in the products. One scientist said that it was possible that the extraction process used to create the supplements removed or destroyed all DNA. This, however, would not explain the presence of DNA from plants such as rice or wheat, that were not listed as ingredients.<ref name="oconnor"/>
<!--T:39-->
A 2013 study on herbal supplements found that many products were of low quality, one third did not contain the active ingredient(s) claimed, and one third contained unlisted substances. In a [[Genetics|genetic]] analysis of herbal supplements, 78% of samples contained animal [[DNA]] that was not identified as an ingredient on the product labels. In some botanical products, undeclared ingredients were used to increase the bulk of the product and reduce its cost of manufacturing, while potentially violating certain religious and/or cultural limitations on consuming animal ingredients, such as cow, buffalo or deer. In 2015, the [[New York Attorney General]] (NY-AG) identified four major retailers with dietary supplement products that contained fraudulent and potentially dangerous ingredients, requiring the companies to remove the products from retail stores. According to the NY-AG, only about 20% of the herbal supplements tested contained the plants claimed. The methodology used by the NY-AG was disputed. The test involves looking for [[DNA]] fragments from the plants named as the dietary supplement ingredients in the products. One scientist said that it was possible that the extraction process used to create the supplements removed or destroyed all DNA. This, however, would not explain the presence of DNA from plants such as rice or wheat, that were not listed as ingredients.


A study of dietary supplements sold between 2007 and 2016 identified 776 that contained unlisted [[pharmaceutical drug]]s, many of which could interact with other medications and lead to hospitalization.<ref name="Tucker2018">{{Cite journal|vauthors=Tucker J, Fischer T, Upjohn L, Mazzera D, Kumar M|date=October 2018|title=Unapproved Pharmaceutical Ingredients Included in Dietary Supplements Associated With US Food and Drug Administration Warnings|journal=JAMA Network Open|language=en|volume=1|issue=6|pages=e183337|doi=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3337|issn=2574-3805|pmc=6324457|pmid=30646238}}</ref> 86% of the adulterated supplements were marketed for weight loss and sexual performance, with many containing prescription [[erectile dysfunction]] medication. [[Bodybuilding|Muscle building]] supplements were contaminated with [[anabolic steroid]]s that can lead to health complications affecting the kidney, the heart, and cause [[gynecomastia]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Mathews NM | title = Prohibited Contaminants in Dietary Supplements | journal = Sports Health | volume = 10 | issue = 1 | pages = 19–30 | date = 2018 | pmid = 28850291 | pmc = 5753965 | doi = 10.1177/1941738117727736 }}</ref> Multiple bodybuilding products also contained [[antidepressant]]s and [[antihistamine]]s. Despite these findings, fewer than half of the adulterated supplements were recalled.<ref name="Tucker2018"/>
<!--T:40-->
A study of dietary supplements sold between 2007 and 2016 identified 776 that contained unlisted [[pharmaceutical drug]]s, many of which could interact with other medications and lead to hospitalization. 86% of the adulterated supplements were marketed for weight loss and sexual performance, with many containing prescription [[erectile dysfunction]] medication. [[Bodybuilding|Muscle building]] supplements were contaminated with [[anabolic steroid]]s that can lead to health complications affecting the kidney, the heart, and cause [[gynecomastia]]. Multiple bodybuilding products also contained [[antidepressant]]s and [[antihistamine]]s. Despite these findings, fewer than half of the adulterated supplements were recalled.


==Regulatory compliance==
==Regulatory compliance== <!--T:41-->
The [[European Commission]] has published harmonized rules on supplement products to assure consumers have minimal health risks from using dietary supplements and are not misled by advertising.<ref name="ec2019">{{cite web |title=Food supplements |url=https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/supplements_en |publisher=European Commission |access-date=31 January 2019 |date=2019}}</ref>
The [[European Commission]] has published harmonized rules on supplement products to assure consumers have minimal health risks from using dietary supplements and are not misled by advertising.


In the United States and Canada, dietary supplements are considered a subset of foods, and are regulated accordingly. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) monitors supplement products for accuracy in advertising and labeling. Dietary supplements are regulated by the FDA as [[food product]]s subject to compliance with current [[Good Manufacturing Practice]]s (CGMP) and labeling with science-based ingredient descriptions and advertising.<ref name="FDAHome17">{{cite web | title=Dietary Supplements | publisher=US Food and Drug Administration | date=12 December 2017 | url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm153239.htm | access-date=31 January 2019}}</ref><ref name="FDAGuide">{{cite web | title=Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter I. General Dietary Supplement Labeling | publisher=US Food and Drug Administration | date=21 March 2018 | url=https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/DietarySupplements/ucm070519.htm | access-date=31 January 2019}}</ref> When finding CGMP or advertising violations, [[FDA warning letter]]s are used to notify manufacturers of impending enforcement action, including [[search and seizure]], [[injunction]], and [[fine (penalty)|financial penalties]].<ref name="FDAWarning2018">{{cite web | title=FDA Warning Letters, 2018 | publisher=US Food and Drug Administration | date=29 January 2019 | url=https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/default.htm | access-date=31 January 2019}}</ref> Examples between 2016 and 2018 of CGMP and advertising violations by dietary supplement manufacturers included several with illegal compositions or advertising of vitamins and minerals.<ref name="vitalife2016">{{cite web | title=Warning letter: Vitalife Inc. |publisher=Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations, US Food and Drug Administration| vauthors = Porter SE | date=20 June 2016 | url=https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm517635 | access-date=31 January 2019}}</ref><ref name="mnh">{{cite web| vauthors = Pace RM |title=Warning letter: Maine Natural Health, Inc.|url=https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2017/ucm590003.htm|publisher=Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations, US Food and Drug Administration|access-date=3 February 2018|date=18 December 2017}}</ref><ref name="buel2018">{{cite web | title=Warning letter: Independent Nutrition Inc. |publisher=Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations, US Food and Drug Administration| vauthors = Burbach MR | date=31 August 2018 | url=https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm620697.htm | access-date=31 January 2019}}</ref>
<!--T:42-->
In the United States and Canada, dietary supplements are considered a subset of foods, and are regulated accordingly. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) monitors supplement products for accuracy in advertising and labeling. Dietary supplements are regulated by the FDA as [[food product]]s subject to compliance with current [[Good Manufacturing Practice]]s (CGMP) and labeling with science-based ingredient descriptions and advertising. When finding CGMP or advertising violations, [[FDA warning letter]]s are used to notify manufacturers of impending enforcement action, including [[search and seizure]], [[injunction]], and [[fine (penalty)|financial penalties]]. Examples between 2016 and 2018 of CGMP and advertising violations by dietary supplement manufacturers included several with illegal compositions or advertising of vitamins and minerals.


The U.S. [[Federal Trade Commission]], which litigates against deceptive advertising in marketed products,<ref name="ftc2010">{{cite web|title=Dannon Agrees to Drop Exaggerated Health Claims for Activia Yogurt and DanActive Dairy Drink FTC Charges that Evidence Supporting Benefits of Probiotics Falls Short|url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2010/12/dannon-agrees-drop-exaggerated-health-claims-activia-yogurt|publisher=Federal Trade Commission, US Government|access-date=9 May 2017|date=15 December 2010}}</ref> established a consumer center to assist reports of false health claims in product advertising for dietary supplements.<ref>{{cite web|title=Dietary supplement concerns? Tell the FTC and FDA|url=https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2017/07/dietary-supplement-concerns-tell-ftc-and-fda|publisher=Federal Trade Commission, US Government|access-date=2 February 2018|date=25 July 2017}}</ref> In 2017, the FTC successfully sued nine manufacturers for deceptive advertising of dietary supplements.<ref>{{cite web|title=Three Dietary Supplement Marketers Settle FTC, Maine AG Charges|url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/08/three-dietary-supplement-marketers-settle-ftc-maine-ag-charges|publisher=Federal Trade Commission, US Government|access-date=2 February 2018|date=23 August 2017}}</ref>
<!--T:43-->
The U.S. [[Federal Trade Commission]], which litigates against deceptive advertising in marketed products, established a consumer center to assist reports of false health claims in product advertising for dietary supplements. In 2017, the FTC successfully sued nine manufacturers for deceptive advertising of dietary supplements.


==Adverse effects==
==Adverse effects== <!--T:44-->
In the United States, manufacturers of dietary supplements are required to demonstrate safety of their products before approval is granted for commerce.<ref name="ndi">{{cite web|title=New Dietary Ingredients in Dietary Supplements - Background for Industry|url=https://www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/ucm109764.htm|publisher=US Food and Drug Administration|access-date=2 February 2018|date=August 2016}}</ref> Despite this caution, numerous adverse effects have been reported,<ref name=gao/> including muscle cramps, hair loss, joint pain, [[liver disease]], and [[allergy|allergic reactions]], with 29% of the adverse effects resulting in hospitalization, and 20% in serious injuries or illnesses.<ref name=gao/> The potential for adverse effects also occurs when individuals consume more than the necessary daily amount of [[vitamin]]s or [[mineral]]s that are needed to maintain normal body processes and functions.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Ronis MJ, Pedersen KB, Watt J | title = Adverse Effects of Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements | journal = Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology | volume = 58 | issue = 1 | pages = 583–601 | date = January 2018 | pmid = 28992429 | pmc = 6380172 | doi = 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052844 }}</ref> The incidence of adverse effects reported to the [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]] were due to "combination products" that contain multiple ingredients, whereas dietary supplements containing a single vitamin, mineral, lipid product, and herbal product were less likely to cause adverse effects related to excess supplementation.<ref name=gao/>
In the United States, manufacturers of dietary supplements are required to demonstrate safety of their products before approval is granted for commerce. Despite this caution, numerous adverse effects have been reported, including muscle cramps, hair loss, joint pain, [[liver disease]], and [[allergy|allergic reactions]], with 29% of the adverse effects resulting in hospitalization, and 20% in serious injuries or illnesses. The potential for adverse effects also occurs when individuals consume more than the necessary daily amount of [[vitamin]]s or [[mineral]]s that are needed to maintain normal body processes and functions. The incidence of adverse effects reported to the [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]] were due to "combination products" that contain multiple ingredients, whereas dietary supplements containing a single vitamin, mineral, lipid product, and herbal product were less likely to cause adverse effects related to excess supplementation.


Among general reasons for the possible harmful effects of dietary supplements are: a) absorption in a short time, b) manufacturing quality and contamination, and c) enhancing both positive and negative effects at the same time.<ref name=coghlan/> The incidence of [[hepatotoxicity|liver injury]] from herbal and dietary supplements is about 16–20% of all supplement products causing injury, with the occurrence growing globally over the early 21st century.<ref name="navarro">{{cite journal | vauthors = Navarro VJ, Khan I, Björnsson E, Seeff LB, Serrano J, Hoofnagle JH | title = Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements | journal = Hepatology | volume = 65 | issue = 1 | pages = 363–373 | date = January 2017 | pmid = 27677775 | pmc = 5502701 | doi = 10.1002/hep.28813 }}</ref> The most common liver injuries from weight loss and bodybuilding supplements involve [[Hepatocyte|hepatocellular]] damage with resulting [[jaundice]], and the most common supplement ingredients attributed to these injuries are green tea [[catechin]]s, [[anabolic steroid]]s, and the herbal [[extract]], [[Aegle marmelos|aegeline]].<ref name=navarro/> Weight loss supplements have also had adverse [[psychiatry|psychiatric effects]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bersani FS, Coviello M, Imperatori C, Francesconi M, Hough CM, Valeriani G, De Stefano G, Bolzan Mariotti Posocco F, Santacroce R, Minichino A, Corazza O | display-authors = 6 | title = Adverse Psychiatric Effects Associated with Herbal Weight-Loss Products | journal = BioMed Research International | volume = 2015 | pages = 120679 | year = 2015 | pmid = 26457296 | pmc = 4589574 | doi = 10.1155/2015/120679 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Some dietary supplements may also have adverse interactions with prescription medications that may enhance side effects or decrease therapeutic effects of medications.<ref>{{Citation|title=Herbal and Dietary Supplement Interactions with Drugs|date=2003|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203490242-17|work=Handbook of Food-Drug Interactions|pages=273–308|publisher=CRC Press|doi=10.1201/9780203490242-17|isbn=978-0-429-20832-4|access-date=2021-07-29}}</ref>
<!--T:45-->
Among general reasons for the possible harmful effects of dietary supplements are: a) absorption in a short time, b) manufacturing quality and contamination, and c) enhancing both positive and negative effects at the same time. The incidence of [[hepatotoxicity|liver injury]] from herbal and dietary supplements is about 16–20% of all supplement products causing injury, with the occurrence growing globally over the early 21st century. The most common liver injuries from weight loss and bodybuilding supplements involve [[Hepatocyte|hepatocellular]] damage with resulting [[jaundice]], and the most common supplement ingredients attributed to these injuries are green tea [[catechin]]s, [[anabolic steroid]]s, and the herbal [[extract]], [[Aegle marmelos|aegeline]]. Weight loss supplements have also had adverse [[psychiatry|psychiatric effects]]. Some dietary supplements may also have adverse interactions with prescription medications that may enhance side effects or decrease therapeutic effects of medications.


==Society and culture==
==Society and culture== <!--T:46-->


===Public health===
===Public health=== <!--T:47-->
Work done by scientists in the early 20th century on identifying individual nutrients in food and developing ways to manufacture them raised hopes that optimal health could be achieved and diseases prevented by adding them to food and providing people with dietary supplements; while there were successes in preventing [[vitamin deficiencies]], and preventing conditions like [[neural tube defects]] by supplementation and [[food fortification]] with [[folic acid]], no targeted supplementation or fortification strategies to prevent major diseases like cancer or cardiovascular diseases have proved successful.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lichtenstein AH, Russell RM | title = Essential nutrients: food or supplements? Where should the emphasis be? | journal = JAMA | volume = 294 | issue = 3 | pages = 351–8 | date = July 2005 | pmid = 16030280 | doi = 10.1001/jama.294.3.351 | s2cid = 2896499 | author-link1 = Alice H. Lichtenstein }}</ref>
Work done by scientists in the early 20th century on identifying individual nutrients in food and developing ways to manufacture them raised hopes that optimal health could be achieved and diseases prevented by adding them to food and providing people with dietary supplements; while there were successes in preventing [[vitamin deficiencies]], and preventing conditions like [[neural tube defects]] by supplementation and [[food fortification]] with [[folic acid]], no targeted supplementation or fortification strategies to prevent major diseases like cancer or cardiovascular diseases have proved successful.


For example, while increased consumption of fruits and vegetables are related to decreases in mortality, cardiovascular diseases and cancers, supplementation with key factors found in fruits and vegetable, like [[antioxidants]], vitamins, or minerals, do not help and some have been found to be harmful in some cases.<ref name="GOVe">{{cite web |url=http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamine.asp |title=Vitamin E — Health Professional Fact Sheet |publisher=dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov |access-date=5 February 2015 |archive-date=13 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090813140742/http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamine.asp |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=Bjelakovic>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C | title = Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2012 | issue = 3 | pages = CD007176 | date = March 2012 | pmid = 22419320 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD007176.pub2 | pmc = 8407395 | hdl-access = free | hdl = 10138/136201 }}</ref> In general, as of 2016, robust clinical data is lacking, that shows that any kind of dietary supplementation does more good than harm for people who are healthy and eating a reasonable diet but there is clear data showing that dietary pattern and lifestyle choices are associated with health outcomes.<ref name=enough>{{cite journal | vauthors = Guallar E, Stranges S, Mulrow C, Appel LJ, Miller ER | title = Enough is enough: Stop wasting money on vitamin and mineral supplements | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | volume = 159 | issue = 12 | pages = 850–1 | date = December 2013 | pmid = 24490268 | doi = 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00011 | type = Editorial | s2cid = 8623113 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.668.4335 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rautiainen S, Manson JE, Lichtenstein AH, Sesso HD | title = Dietary supplements and disease prevention - a global overview | journal = Nature Reviews. Endocrinology | volume = 12 | issue = 7 | pages = 407–20 | date = July 2016 | pmid = 27150288 | doi = 10.1038/nrendo.2016.54 | s2cid = 8722286 }}</ref>
<!--T:48-->
For example, while increased consumption of fruits and vegetables are related to decreases in mortality, cardiovascular diseases and cancers, supplementation with key factors found in fruits and vegetable, like [[antioxidants]], vitamins, or minerals, do not help and some have been found to be harmful in some cases.  In general, as of 2016, robust clinical data is lacking, that shows that any kind of dietary supplementation does more good than harm for people who are healthy and eating a reasonable diet but there is clear data showing that dietary pattern and lifestyle choices are associated with health outcomes.


As a result of the lack of good data for supplementation and the strong data for dietary pattern, public health recommendations for [[healthy eating]] urge people to eat a [[plant-based diet]] of whole foods, minimizing [[ultra-processed food]], salt and sugar and to get exercise daily, and to abandon [[Western pattern diet]]s and a sedentary lifestyle.<ref name=katz>{{cite journal | vauthors = Katz DL, Meller S | title = Can we say what diet is best for health? | journal = Annual Review of Public Health | volume = 35 | pages = 83–103 | year = 2014 | pmid = 24641555 | doi = 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182351 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="fitz">{{cite book | vauthors = Fitzgerald M |title=Diet Cults: The Surprising Fallacy at the Core of Nutrition Fads and a Guide to Healthy Eating for the Rest of US |year=2014 |publisher=Pegasus Books |isbn=978-1-60598-560-2 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/dietcultssurpris0000fitz }}</ref>{{rp|10}}
<!--T:49-->
As a result of the lack of good data for supplementation and the strong data for dietary pattern, public health recommendations for [[healthy eating]] urge people to eat a [[plant-based diet]] of whole foods, minimizing [[ultra-processed food]], salt and sugar and to get exercise daily, and to abandon [[Western pattern diet]]s and a sedentary lifestyle.


===Legal regulation===
===Legal regulation=== <!--T:50-->


====United States====
====United States==== <!--T:51-->
{{Main|Regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration}}
{{Main|Regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration}}
The regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is governed by various statutes enacted by the [[United States Congress]]. Pursuant to the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]] and accompanying legislation, the FDA has authority to oversee the quality of substances sold as food in the United States, and to monitor claims made in the [[Packaging and labeling|labeling]] about both the composition and the health benefits of foods.
The regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is governed by various statutes enacted by the [[United States Congress]]. Pursuant to the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]] and accompanying legislation, the FDA has authority to oversee the quality of substances sold as food in the United States, and to monitor claims made in the [[Packaging and labeling|labeling]] about both the composition and the health benefits of foods.


<!--T:52-->
Substances which the FDA regulates as food are subdivided into various categories, including foods, [[food additive]]s, added substances (man-made substances which are not intentionally introduced into food, but nevertheless end up in it), and dietary supplements. The specific standards which the FDA exercises differ from one category to the next. Furthermore, the FDA has been granted a variety of means by which it can address violations of the standards for a given category of substances.
Substances which the FDA regulates as food are subdivided into various categories, including foods, [[food additive]]s, added substances (man-made substances which are not intentionally introduced into food, but nevertheless end up in it), and dietary supplements. The specific standards which the FDA exercises differ from one category to the next. Furthermore, the FDA has been granted a variety of means by which it can address violations of the standards for a given category of substances.


Dietary supplement manufacture is required to comply with the good manufacturing practices established in 2007. The FDA can visit manufacturing facilities, send [[FDA warning letter|Warning Letters]]<ref name=mnh/> if not in compliance with GMPs, stop production, and if there is a health risk, require that the company conduct a recall.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/CGMP/ucm079496.htm | title = Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs) for Dietary Supplements | publisher = U.S. Food and Drug Administration | date = 2007 }}</ref> Only after a dietary supplement product is marketed, may the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) review the products for safety and effectiveness.<ref>{{cite web | author = Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition |date=16 August 2019 |title=Information for Consumers on Using Dietary Supplements|url=https://www.fda.gov/food/dietary-supplements/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements|website=FDA|language=en}}</ref>
<!--T:53-->
Dietary supplement manufacture is required to comply with the good manufacturing practices established in 2007. The FDA can visit manufacturing facilities, send [[FDA warning letter|Warning Letters]] if not in compliance with GMPs, stop production, and if there is a health risk, require that the company conduct a recall. Only after a dietary supplement product is marketed, may the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) review the products for safety and effectiveness.


====European Union====
====European Union==== <!--T:54-->
The [[European Union]]'s (EU) Food Supplements Directive of 2002 requires that supplements be demonstrated to be safe, both in dosages and in purity.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0046:EN:HTML |title=Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to food supplements |publisher=Eur-lex.europa.eu |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref> Only those supplements that have been proven to be safe may be sold in the EU without prescription. As a category of food, food supplements cannot be labeled with drug claims but can bear [[health claim]]s and nutrition claims.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labellingnutrition/claims/index_en.htm |title=European Commission website: Food Safety – Labelling & Nutrition – Health & Nutrition Claims |publisher=Ec.europa.eu |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref>
The [[European Union]]'s (EU) Food Supplements Directive of 2002 requires that supplements be demonstrated to be safe, both in dosages and in purity. Only those supplements that have been proven to be safe may be sold in the EU without prescription. As a category of food, food supplements cannot be labeled with drug claims but can bear [[health claim]]s and nutrition claims.


The dietary supplements industry in the [[United Kingdom]] (UK), one of the 28 countries in the bloc, strongly opposed the Directive. In addition, a large number of consumers throughout Europe, including over one million in the UK, and various doctors and scientists, had signed petitions by 2005 against what are viewed by the petitioners as unjustified restrictions of [[consumer choice]].<ref name="Times">{{cite news|url=http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article2598585.ece |last1=Knight|first1=S |title=Controversial EU vitamins ban to go ahead|newspaper=[[The Times Online]]|date=12 July 2005|access-date=5 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510173214/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article2598585.ece|archive-date=2015-05-10|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2004, along with two British trade associations, the [[Alliance for Natural Health]] (ANH) had a legal challenge to the Food Supplements Directive<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labellingnutrition/supplements/index_en.htm|title=Food supplements - Food Safety - European Commission|website=Food Safety|date=2016-10-17}}</ref> referred to the [[European Court of Justice]] by the High Court in London.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3445503.stm |title=Court victory for vitamin firms |work=BBC News |date=30 January 2004 |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref>
<!--T:55-->
The dietary supplements industry in the [[United Kingdom]] (UK), one of the 28 countries in the bloc, strongly opposed the Directive. In addition, a large number of consumers throughout Europe, including over one million in the UK, and various doctors and scientists, had signed petitions by 2005 against what are viewed by the petitioners as unjustified restrictions of [[consumer choice]]. In 2004, along with two British trade associations, the [[Alliance for Natural Health]] (ANH) had a legal challenge to the Food Supplements Directive referred to the [[European Court of Justice]] by the High Court in London.


Although the European Court of Justice's Advocate General subsequently said that the bloc's plan to tighten rules on the sale of [[vitamins]] and food supplements should be scrapped,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4411929.stm |title='EU health foods crackdown 'wrong'' |work=BBC News |date=5 April 2005 |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref> he was eventually overruled by the European Court, which decided that the measures in question were necessary and appropriate for the purpose of protecting [[public health]]. ANH, however, interpreted the ban as applying only to synthetically produced supplements, and not to vitamins and minerals normally found in or consumed as part of the diet.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4670971.stm |title=Vitamin controls backed by Europe |work=BBC News |date=12 July 2005 |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref> Nevertheless, the European judges acknowledged the Advocate General's concerns, stating that there must be clear procedures to allow substances to be added to the permitted list based on scientific evidence. They also said that any refusal to add the product to the list must be open to challenge in the courts.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk_news/story/0,,1526892,00.html |title=EU court backs health supplements ban |newspaper=Guardian |date=12 July 2005 |access-date=5 December 2012}}</ref>
<!--T:56-->
Although the European Court of Justice's Advocate General subsequently said that the bloc's plan to tighten rules on the sale of [[vitamins]] and food supplements should be scrapped, he was eventually overruled by the European Court, which decided that the measures in question were necessary and appropriate for the purpose of protecting [[public health]]. ANH, however, interpreted the ban as applying only to synthetically produced supplements, and not to vitamins and minerals normally found in or consumed as part of the diet. Nevertheless, the European judges acknowledged the Advocate General's concerns, stating that there must be clear procedures to allow substances to be added to the permitted list based on scientific evidence. They also said that any refusal to add the product to the list must be open to challenge in the courts.


===Fraudulent products during the COVID-19 outbreak===
===Fraudulent products during the COVID-19 outbreak=== <!--T:57-->
During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in the United States, the [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]] and [[Federal Trade Commission]] (FTC) warned consumers about [[fraud|marketing scam]]s of fraudulent supplement products, including [[homeopathy|homeopathic remedies]], [[cannabidiol|cannabidiol products]], teas, [[essential oil]]s, [[tincture]]s and [[colloidal silver]], among others.<ref name="fda-scams">{{cite web |title=Fraudulent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) products |url=https://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-products |publisher=US Food and Drug Administration |access-date=8 April 2020 |date=7 April 2020}}</ref><ref name="ftc-scams">{{cite web |title=Coronavirus: Scammers follow the headlines |url=https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2020/02/coronavirus-scammers-follow-headlines |publisher=US Federal Trade Commission |access-date=1 March 2020 |date=10 February 2020}}</ref> By August 2020, the FDA and FTC had issued [[FDA warning letter|warning letters]] to dozens of companies advertising scam products, which were purported "to be drugs, medical devices or vaccines. Products that claim to cure, mitigate, treat, diagnose or prevent disease, but are not proven safe and effective for those purposes, defraud consumers of money and can place consumers at risk for serious harm"<ref name=fda-scams/><ref name=ftc-5-14>{{cite web|title=FTC coronavirus warning letters to companies|url=https://www.ftc.gov/coronavirus/enforcement/warning-letters|date=29 July 2020|publisher=US Federal Trade Commission|access-date=15 August 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Masterson D |title=FTC to marketers: Stop making unsupported COVID treatment claims |url=https://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Article/2020/08/17/FTC-to-marketers-Stop-making-unsupported-COVID-treatment-claims |publisher=NutraIngredients.com-USA, William Reed, Inc. |access-date=18 August 2020 |date=17 August 2020}}</ref>
During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in the United States, the [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]] and [[Federal Trade Commission]] (FTC) warned consumers about [[fraud|marketing scam]]s of fraudulent supplement products, including [[homeopathy|homeopathic remedies]], [[cannabidiol|cannabidiol products]], teas, [[essential oil]]s, [[tincture]]s and [[colloidal silver]], among others. By August 2020, the FDA and FTC had issued [[FDA warning letter|warning letters]] to dozens of companies advertising scam products, which were purported "to be drugs, medical devices or vaccines. Products that claim to cure, mitigate, treat, diagnose or prevent disease, but are not proven safe and effective for those purposes, defraud consumers of money and can place consumers at risk for serious harm"


==Research==
==Research== <!--T:58-->
Examples of ongoing government research organizations to better understand the potential health properties and safety of dietary supplements are the [[European Food Safety Authority]],<ref name=efsa/> the Office of Dietary Supplements of the United States [[National Institutes of Health]],<ref name=odsfaqs/><ref name="dwyer">{{cite journal | vauthors = Dwyer JT, Coates PM, Smith MJ | title = Dietary Supplements: Regulatory Challenges and Research Resources | journal = Nutrients | volume = 10 | issue = 1 | pages = 41 | date = January 2018 | pmid = 29300341 | pmc = 5793269 | doi = 10.3390/nu10010041 | doi-access = free }}</ref> the [[Natural Health Products Directorate|Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate]] of Canada,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/natural-non-prescription/regulation/about-products.html|title=About Natural Health Products|publisher=Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate, Government of Canada|date=14 March 2013|access-date=3 February 2018}}</ref> and the [[Therapeutic Goods Administration]] of Australia.<ref>{{cite web|title=Complementary medicines|url=https://www.tga.gov.au/complementary-medicines|publisher=Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government|access-date=3 February 2018|date=2018}}</ref> Together with public and private research groups, these agencies construct [[database]]s on supplement properties, perform research on quality, safety, and population trends of supplement use, and evaluate the potential clinical efficacy of supplements for maintaining health or lowering disease risk.<ref name=dwyer/>
Examples of ongoing government research organizations to better understand the potential health properties and safety of dietary supplements are the [[European Food Safety Authority]], the Office of Dietary Supplements of the United States [[National Institutes of Health]], the [[Natural Health Products Directorate|Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate]] of Canada, and the [[Therapeutic Goods Administration]] of Australia. Together with public and private research groups, these agencies construct [[database]]s on supplement properties, perform research on quality, safety, and population trends of supplement use, and evaluate the potential clinical efficacy of supplements for maintaining health or lowering disease risk.


===Databases===
===Databases=== <!--T:59-->
As continual research on the properties of supplements accumulates, databases or fact sheets for various supplements are updated regularly, including the Dietary Supplement Label Database,<ref name=odsdata/> Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database,<ref name="dsid">{{cite web|title=Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database|url=https://dietarysupplementdatabase.usda.nih.gov/|publisher=Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health and US Department of Agriculture, National Nutrient Database|access-date=3 February 2018|date=14 August 2017}}</ref> and Dietary Supplement Facts Sheets of the United States.<ref name="ods-facts">{{cite web|title=Dietary Supplement Fact Sheets|url=https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/list-all/|publisher=Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health|date=2018|access-date=3 February 2018}}</ref> In Canada where a license is issued when a supplement product has been proven by the manufacturer and government to be safe, effective and of sufficient quality for its recommended use, an eight-digit Natural Product Number is assigned and recorded in a Licensed Natural Health Products Database.<ref>{{cite web|title=Licensed Natural Health Products Database|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/natural-non-prescription/applications-submissions/product-licensing/licensed-natural-health-products-database.html|publisher=Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate, Government of Canada|access-date=3 February 2018|date=4 May 2015}}</ref> The European Food Safety Authority maintains a [[compendium]] of botanical ingredients used in manufacturing of dietary supplements.<ref name=efsa-comp/>
As continual research on the properties of supplements accumulates, databases or fact sheets for various supplements are updated regularly, including the Dietary Supplement Label Database, Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database, and Dietary Supplement Facts Sheets of the United States. In Canada where a license is issued when a supplement product has been proven by the manufacturer and government to be safe, effective and of sufficient quality for its recommended use, an eight-digit Natural Product Number is assigned and recorded in a Licensed Natural Health Products Database. The European Food Safety Authority maintains a [[compendium]] of botanical ingredients used in manufacturing of dietary supplements.


In 2015, the [[Department of Health (Australia)|Australian Government's Department of Health]] published the results of a review of herbal supplements to determine if any were suitable for coverage by [[health insurance]].<ref name=aus17>{{cite web |url=http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/0E9129B3574FCA53CA257BF0001ACD11/$File/Natural%20Therapies%20Overview%20Report%20Final%20with%20copyright%2011%20March.pdf |publisher=Australian Government – Department of Health | vauthors = Baggoley C |title=Review of the Australian Government Rebate on Natural Therapies for Private Health Insurance |date=November 2015 |access-date=3 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626024750/http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/0E9129B3574FCA53CA257BF0001ACD11/$File/Natural%20Therapies%20Overview%20Report%20Final%20with%20copyright%2011%20March.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Establishing guidelines to assess safety and efficacy of botanical supplement products, the [[European Medicines Agency]] provided criteria for evaluating and grading the quality of clinical research in preparing monographs about herbal supplements.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000830.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580033a9b|title=Assessment of clinical safety and efficacy in the preparation of Community herbal monographs for well-established and of Community herbal monographs/entries to the Community list for traditional herbal medicinal products/substances/preparations|publisher=European Medicines Agency|date=2017|access-date=25 February 2017}}</ref> In the United States, the [[National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health]] of the National Institutes of Health provides fact sheets evaluating the safety, potential effectiveness and side effects of many botanical products.<ref name="nccih">{{cite web|url=https://nccih.nih.gov/health/herbsataglance.htm|title=Herbs at a Glance|publisher=National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, US National Institutes of Health|date=21 November 2016|access-date=24 February 2017}}</ref>
<!--T:60-->
In 2015, the [[Department of Health (Australia)|Australian Government's Department of Health]] published the results of a review of herbal supplements to determine if any were suitable for coverage by [[health insurance]]. Establishing guidelines to assess safety and efficacy of botanical supplement products, the [[European Medicines Agency]] provided criteria for evaluating and grading the quality of clinical research in preparing monographs about herbal supplements. In the United States, the [[National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health]] of the National Institutes of Health provides fact sheets evaluating the safety, potential effectiveness and side effects of many botanical products.


===Quality and safety===
===Quality and safety=== <!--T:61-->
To assure supplements have sufficient quality, standardization, and safety for public consumption, research efforts have focused on development of reference materials for supplement manufacturing and monitoring.<ref name="efsa-comp">{{cite journal|author1=European Food Safety Authority|title=Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally {{sic|occur|ing|nolink=y}} substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements|journal=EFSA Journal|date=May 2012|volume=10|issue=5|page=2663|doi=10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Measurements and Standards for Botanical Dietary Supplements|journal=NIST |url=https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/measurements-and-standards-botanical-dietary-supplements|publisher=US National Institute of Standards and Technology|access-date=3 February 2018|date=21 September 2016}}</ref> High-dose products have received research attention,<ref name=dwyer/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Dwyer JT, Wiemer KL, Dary O, Keen CL, King JC, Miller KB, Philbert MA, Tarasuk V, Taylor CL, Gaine PC, Jarvis AB, Bailey RL | display-authors = 6 | title = Fortification and health: challenges and opportunities | journal = Advances in Nutrition | volume = 6 | issue = 1 | pages = 124–31 | date = January 2015 | pmid = 25593151 | pmc = 4288271 | doi = 10.3945/an.114.007443 }}</ref> especially for emergency situations such as [[vitamin A]] deficiency in malnutrition of children,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Iannotti LL, Trehan I, Manary MJ | title = Review of the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation in the treatment of children with severe acute malnutrition | journal = Nutrition Journal | volume = 12 | pages = 125 | date = September 2013 | pmid = 24028603 | pmc = 3850897 | doi = 10.1186/1475-2891-12-125 | doi-access = free }}</ref> and for women taking folate supplements to reduce the risk of [[breast cancer]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen P, Li C, Li X, Li J, Chu R, Wang H | title = Higher dietary folate intake reduces the breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = British Journal of Cancer | volume = 110 | issue = 9 | pages = 2327–38 | date = April 2014 | pmid = 24667649 | pmc = 4007237 | doi = 10.1038/bjc.2014.155 }}</ref>
To assure supplements have sufficient quality, standardization, and safety for public consumption, research efforts have focused on development of reference materials for supplement manufacturing and monitoring. High-dose products have received research attention, especially for emergency situations such as [[vitamin A]] deficiency in malnutrition of children, and for women taking folate supplements to reduce the risk of [[breast cancer]].


===Population monitoring===
===Population monitoring=== <!--T:62-->
In the United States, the [[National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey]] (NHANES) has investigated habits of using dietary supplements in context of total nutrient intakes from the diet in adults and children.<ref name=dwyer/> Over the period of 1999 to 2012, use of multivitamins decreased, and there was wide variability in the use of individual supplements among subgroups by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and educational status.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, White E, Giovannucci EL | title = Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012 | journal = JAMA | volume = 316 | issue = 14 | pages = 1464–1474 | date = October 2016 | pmid = 27727382 | pmc = 5540241 | doi = 10.1001/jama.2016.14403 }}</ref> Particular attention has been given to use of folate supplements by young women to reduce the risk of [[fetus|fetal]] [[neural tube defect]]s.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Obeid R, Koletzko B, Pietrzik K | title = Critical evaluation of lowering the recommended dietary intake of folate | journal = Clinical Nutrition | volume = 33 | issue = 2 | pages = 252–9 | date = April 2014 | pmid = 24503418 | doi = 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Wilson RD, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock JA, Carroll J, Cartier L, Gagnon A, Johnson JA, Langlois S, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Okun N, Pastuck M, Deb-Rinker P, Dodds L, Leon JA, Lowel HL, Luo W, MacFarlane A, McMillan R, Moore A, Mundle W, O'Connor D, Ray J, Van den Hof M | display-authors = 6 | title = Pre-conception Folic Acid and Multivitamin Supplementation for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Neural Tube Defects and Other Folic Acid-Sensitive Congenital Anomalies | journal = Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada | volume = 37 | issue = 6 | pages = 534–52 | date = June 2015 | pmid = 26334606 | doi = 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30230-9 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
In the United States, the [[National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey]] (NHANES) has investigated habits of using dietary supplements in context of total nutrient intakes from the diet in adults and children. Over the period of 1999 to 2012, use of multivitamins decreased, and there was wide variability in the use of individual supplements among subgroups by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and educational status. Particular attention has been given to use of folate supplements by young women to reduce the risk of [[fetus|fetal]] [[neural tube defect]]s.


===Clinical studies===
===Clinical studies=== <!--T:63-->
Limited human research has been conducted on the potential for dietary supplementation to affect disease risk. Examples:
Limited human research has been conducted on the potential for dietary supplementation to affect disease risk. Examples:
* [[vitamin D]] {{ndash}} acute [[respiratory tract infection]]s<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, Dubnov-Raz G, Esposito S, Ganmaa D, Ginde AA, Goodall EC, Grant CC, Griffiths CJ, Janssens W, Laaksi I, Manaseki-Holland S, Mauger D, Murdoch DR, Neale R, Rees JR, Simpson S, Stelmach I, Kumar GT, Urashima M, Camargo CA | display-authors = 6 | title = Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data | journal = BMJ | volume = 356 | pages = i6583 | date = February 2017 | pmid = 28202713 | pmc = 5310969 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.i6583 }}</ref>
* [[vitamin D]] {{ndash}} acute [[respiratory tract infection]]s
* [[mineral (nutrient)|iron]] {{ndash}} maternal [[iron deficiency anemia]] and adverse effects on the [[fetus]]<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = O'Brien KO, Ru Y | title = Iron status of North American pregnant women: an update on longitudinal data and gaps in knowledge from the United States and Canada | journal = The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | volume = 106 | issue = Suppl 6 | pages = 1647S–1654S | date = December 2017 | pmid = 29070557 | pmc = 5701721 | doi = 10.3945/ajcn.117.155986 }}</ref>
* [[mineral (nutrient)|iron]] {{ndash}} maternal [[iron deficiency anemia]] and adverse effects on the [[fetus]]
* multiple supplements {{ndash}} no evidence of benefit to lower risk of death, cardiovascular diseases or cancer<ref name="an2017">{{cite journal | vauthors = Schwingshackl L, Boeing H, Stelmach-Mardas M, Gottschald M, Dietrich S, Hoffmann G, Chaimani A | title = Dietary Supplements and Risk of Cause-Specific Death, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Primary Prevention Trials | journal = Advances in Nutrition | volume = 8 | issue = 1 | pages = 27–39 | date = January 2017 | pmid = 28096125 | pmc = 5227980 | doi = 10.3945/an.116.013516 }}</ref>
* multiple supplements {{ndash}} no evidence of benefit to lower risk of death, cardiovascular diseases or cancer
* magnesium supplementation {{ndash}} in reducing all-cause and cancer mortality,<ref name="Bagheri Naghshi Sadeghi Larijani pp. 1196–1210">{{cite journal | last1=Bagheri | first1=Amir | last2=Naghshi | first2=Sina | last3=Sadeghi | first3=Omid | last4=Larijani | first4=Bagher | last5=Esmaillzadeh | first5=Ahmad | title=Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Magnesium Intakes and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | journal=Advances in Nutrition | publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) | volume=12 | issue=4 | date=2021-03-03 | issn=2161-8313 | pmid=33684200 | pmc=8321838 | doi=10.1093/advances/nmab001 | pages=1196–1210}}</ref> as well as improving glucose parameters in people with diabetes and insulin-sensitivity parameters in those at high risk of diabetes.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Veronese N, Dominguez LJ, Pizzol D, Demurtas J, Smith L, Barbagallo M |title=Oral Magnesium Supplementation for Treating Glucose Metabolism Parameters in People with or at Risk of Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials |journal=Nutrients |volume=13 |issue=11 |date=November 2021 |page=4074 |pmid=34836329 |pmc=8619199 |doi=10.3390/nu13114074 |url=|doi-access=free }}</ref>
* magnesium supplementation {{ndash}} in reducing all-cause and cancer mortality, as well as improving glucose parameters in people with diabetes and insulin-sensitivity parameters in those at high risk of diabetes.
* [[folate]] alone or with B vitamins {{ndash}} [[stroke]]<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Li Y, Huang T, Zheng Y, Muka T, Troup J, Hu FB | title = Folic Acid Supplementation and the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | journal = Journal of the American Heart Association | volume = 5 | issue = 8 | pages = e003768 | date = August 2016 | pmid = 27528407 | pmc = 5015297 | doi = 10.1161/JAHA.116.003768 }}</ref><ref name="Ingles Cruz Rodriguez Garcia p. ">{{cite journal | last1=Ingles | first1=David Perez | last2=Cruz Rodriguez | first2=Jose B. | last3=Garcia | first3=Hernando | title=Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment | journal=Current Cardiology Reports | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=22 | issue=4 | date=2020-02-14 | issn=1523-3782 | pmid=32067177 | doi=10.1007/s11886-020-1270-1 | page=22| s2cid=211139054 }}</ref>
* [[folate]] alone or with B vitamins {{ndash}} [[stroke]]


A 2017 academic review indicated a rising [[Incidence (epidemiology)|incidence]] of liver injury from use of herbal and dietary supplements, particularly those with [[steroid]]s, [[green tea extract]], or multiple ingredients.<ref name="navarro"/>
<!--T:64-->
A 2017 academic review indicated a rising [[Incidence (epidemiology)|incidence]] of liver injury from use of herbal and dietary supplements, particularly those with [[steroid]]s, [[green tea extract]], or multiple ingredients.


===Absence of benefit===
===Absence of benefit=== <!--T:65-->
The potential benefit of using essential nutrient dietary supplements to lower the risk of diseases has been refuted by findings of no effect or weak evidence in numerous clinical reviews, such as for [[HIV]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Visser ME, Durao S, Sinclair D, Irlam JH, Siegfried N | title = Micronutrient supplementation in adults with HIV infection | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2017 | issue = 5 | pages = CD003650 | date = May 2017 | pmid = 28518221 | pmc = 5458097 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD003650.pub4 }}</ref> or [[tuberculosis]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Grobler L, Nagpal S, Sudarsanam TD, Sinclair D | title = Nutritional supplements for people being treated for active tuberculosis | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 6 | pages = CD006086 | date = June 2016 | volume = 2016 | pmid = 27355911 | pmc = 4981643 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD006086.pub4 }}</ref>
The potential benefit of using essential nutrient dietary supplements to lower the risk of diseases has been refuted by findings of no effect or weak evidence in numerous clinical reviews, such as for [[HIV]], or [[tuberculosis]].


===Reporting bias===
===Reporting bias=== <!--T:66-->
A review of clinical trials registered at [[clinicaltrials.gov]], which would include both drugs and supplements, reported that nearly half of completed trials were sponsored wholly or partially by industry.<ref name=Dunn2014>{{cite journal | vauthors = Dunn AG, Coiera E | title = Should comparative effectiveness research ignore industry-funded data? | journal = Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research | volume = 3 | issue = 4 | pages = 317–20 | date = July 2014 | pmid = 25275226 | doi = 10.2217/cer.14.31 | doi-access = free }}</ref> This does not automatically imply bias, but there is evidence that because of selective non-reporting, results in support of a potential drug or supplement ingredient are more likely to be published than results that do not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit.<ref name=Dunn2014 /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P | title = The potential impact of unpublished results | journal = Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | volume = 66 | issue = 10 | pages = 1061–3 | date = October 2013 | pmid = 23993310 | doi = 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.001 | doi-access = free }}</ref> One review reported that fewer than half of the registered clinical trials resulted in publication in peer-reviewed journals.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Zarin DA, Tse T, Sheehan J | title = The proposed rule for U.S. clinical trial registration and results submission | journal = The New England Journal of Medicine | volume = 372 | issue = 2 | pages = 174–80 | date = January 2015 | pmid = 25539444 | pmc = 4344313 | doi = 10.1056/NEJMsr1414226 }}</ref>
A review of clinical trials registered at [[clinicaltrials.gov]], which would include both drugs and supplements, reported that nearly half of completed trials were sponsored wholly or partially by industry. This does not automatically imply bias, but there is evidence that because of selective non-reporting, results in support of a potential drug or supplement ingredient are more likely to be published than results that do not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit. One review reported that fewer than half of the registered clinical trials resulted in publication in peer-reviewed journals.


===Future===
===Future=== <!--T:67-->
Improving public information about use of dietary supplements involves investments in professional training programs, further studies of population and nutrient needs, expanding the [[database]] information, enhancing collaborations between governments and universities, and translating dietary supplement research into useful information for consumers, [[health professional]]s, scientists, and policymakers.<ref name="ods-strat">{{cite web|title=ODS Strategic Plan 2017-2021|url=https://ods.od.nih.gov/About/StrategicPlan2017-2021.aspx|publisher=Office of Dietary Supplements, US National Institutes of Health|access-date=3 February 2018|date=December 2017}}</ref> Future demonstration of efficacy from use of dietary supplements requires high-quality [[clinical research]] using rigorously qualified products and compliance with established guidelines for reporting of clinical trial results (e.g., [[Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials|CONSORT guidelines]]).<ref name=dwyer/>
Improving public information about use of dietary supplements involves investments in professional training programs, further studies of population and nutrient needs, expanding the [[database]] information, enhancing collaborations between governments and universities, and translating dietary supplement research into useful information for consumers, [[health professional]]s, scientists, and policymakers. Future demonstration of efficacy from use of dietary supplements requires high-quality [[clinical research]] using rigorously qualified products and compliance with established guidelines for reporting of clinical trial results (e.g., [[Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials|CONSORT guidelines]]).


== See also ==
== See also == <!--T:68-->
{{Portal|Food}}
{{Portal|Food}}
{{Div col}}
{{Div col}}
Line 201: Line 245:
* [[Natural Standard]]
* [[Natural Standard]]


<!--T:69-->
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}


== References ==
== Further reading == <!--T:70-->
{{Reflist|30em}}
 
== Further reading ==
* {{cite web | url = http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/pubs/bibs/gen/dietarysupplementsconsumers06.pdf | title = Dietary Supplements: General Resources for Consumers | author = Food and Nutrition Information Center | publisher = [[United States National Agricultural Library|National Agricultural Library]] | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081216224858/http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/pubs/bibs/gen/dietarysupplementsconsumers06.pdf | archive-date = 2008-12-16 }} List of resources that provides an overview of herbal and dietary supplements, including use, regulation, research, and cautionary information.
* {{cite web | url = http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/pubs/bibs/gen/dietarysupplementsconsumers06.pdf | title = Dietary Supplements: General Resources for Consumers | author = Food and Nutrition Information Center | publisher = [[United States National Agricultural Library|National Agricultural Library]] | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081216224858/http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/pubs/bibs/gen/dietarysupplementsconsumers06.pdf | archive-date = 2008-12-16 }} List of resources that provides an overview of herbal and dietary supplements, including use, regulation, research, and cautionary information.
* {{cite web | url = https://www.nutrition.gov/dietary-supplements/questions-ask-taking-vitamin-and-mineral-supplements | title = Questions to Ask Before Taking Vitamin and Mineral Supplements | work = nutrition.gov | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170622161438/https://www.nutrition.gov/dietary-supplements/questions-ask-taking-vitamin-and-mineral-supplements | archive-date = 2017-06-22 }}
* {{cite web | url = https://www.nutrition.gov/dietary-supplements/questions-ask-taking-vitamin-and-mineral-supplements | title = Questions to Ask Before Taking Vitamin and Mineral Supplements | work = nutrition.gov | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170622161438/https://www.nutrition.gov/dietary-supplements/questions-ask-taking-vitamin-and-mineral-supplements | archive-date = 2017-06-22 }}
* {{cite web | url = http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/list-all/ | title = Dietary Supplement Fact Sheets | work = NIH Office of Dietary Supplements }}
* {{cite web | url = http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/list-all/ | title = Dietary Supplement Fact Sheets | work = NIH Office of Dietary Supplements }}


== External links ==
== External links == <!--T:71-->
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT ADD LINKS TO COMMERCIAL SITES OR PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC CLAIM SITES. -->
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT ADD LINKS TO COMMERCIAL SITES OR PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC CLAIM SITES. -->
{{Commons category|Dietary supplements}}
{{Commons category|Dietary supplements}}
* {{cite web | url = https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/herb_All.html | work = MedlinePlus | title = Herbs and Supplements | publisher = [[United States National Library of Medicine]] }}
* {{cite web | url = https://nccih.nih.gov/health/supplements/wiseuse.htm | title = Using Dietary Supplements Wisely | work = U.S. [[National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health]] }}


<!--T:72-->
{{Dietary supplement|state=expanded}}
{{Dietary supplement|state=expanded}}
{{Diets}}
{{Diets}}


<!--T:73-->
{{二次利用|date=15 October 2023|WD=no}}
{{二次利用|date=15 October 2023|WD=no}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dietary Supplement}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dietary Supplement}}
[[Category:Dietary supplements| ]]
[[Category:Dietary supplements| ]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
</translate>

Latest revision as of 18:53, 7 November 2023



As a pill
As a capsule
As a tablet
As a softgel capsule used for fish oil or large amounts of vitamin E
As a shake and bottled powder
Production of cod liver oil, one of the first dietary supplement products manufactured, in the 18th century

A dietary supplement is a manufactured product intended to supplement one's diet by taking a pill, capsule, tablet, powder, or liquid. A supplement can provide nutrients either extracted from food sources or that are synthetic in order to increase the quantity of their consumption. The class of nutrient compounds includes vitamins, minerals, fiber, fatty acids, and amino acids. Dietary supplements can also contain substances that have not been confirmed as being essential to life, but are marketed as having a beneficial biological effect, such as plant pigments or polyphenols. Animals can also be a source of supplement ingredients, such as collagen from chickens or fish for example. These are also sold individually and in combination, and may be combined with nutrient ingredients. The European Commission has also established harmonized rules to help insure that food supplements are safe and appropriately labeled.

Creating an industry estimated to have a value of $151.9 billion in 2021, there are more than 50,000 dietary supplement products marketed in the United States, where about 50% of the American adult population consumes dietary supplements. Multivitamins are the most commonly used product among types of dietary supplements. The United States National Institutes of Health states that supplements "may be of value" for those who are nutrient deficient from their diet and receive approval from their medical provider.

In the United States, it is against federal regulations for supplement manufacturers to claim that these products prevent or treat any disease. Companies are allowed to use what is referred to as "Structure/Function" wording if there is substantiation of scientific evidence for a supplement providing a potential health effect. An example would be "_____ helps maintain healthy joints", but the label must bear a disclaimer that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "has not evaluated the claim" and that the dietary supplement product is not intended to "diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease", because only a drug can legally make such a claim. The FDA enforces these regulations and also prohibits the sale of supplements and supplement ingredients that are dangerous, or supplements not made according to standardized good manufacturing practices (GMPs).

Definition

In the United States, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 provides this description: "The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) defines the term "dietary supplement" to mean a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of any of the aforementioned ingredients. Furthermore, a dietary supplement must be labeled as a dietary supplement and be intended for ingestion and must not be represented for use as conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or of the diet. In addition, a dietary supplement cannot be approved or authorized for investigation as a new drug, antibiotic, or biologic, unless it was marketed as a food or a dietary supplement before such approval or authorization. Under DSHEA, dietary supplements are deemed to be food, except for purposes of the drug definition."

Per DSHEA, dietary supplements are consumed orally, and are mainly defined by what they are not: conventional foods (including meal replacements), medical foods, preservatives or pharmaceutical drugs. Products intended for use as a nasal spray, or topically, as a lotion applied to the skin, do not qualify. FDA-approved drugs cannot be ingredients in dietary supplements. Supplement products are or contain vitamins, nutritionally essential minerals, amino acids, essential fatty acids and non-nutrient substances extracted from plants or animals or fungi or bacteria, or in the instance of probiotics, are live bacteria. Dietary supplement ingredients may also be synthetic copies of naturally occurring substances (for example: melatonin). All products with these ingredients are required to be labeled as dietary supplements. Like foods and unlike drugs, no government approval is required to make or sell dietary supplements; the manufacturer confirms the safety of dietary supplements but the government does not; and rather than requiring risk–benefit analysis to prove that the product can be sold like a drug, such assessment is only used by the FDA to decide that a dietary supplement is unsafe and should be removed from market.

Types

Vitamins

Pharmacies and supermarkets in the U.S. sell a large variety of vitamin dietary supplements.

A vitamin is an organic compound required by an organism as a vital nutrient in limited amounts. An organic chemical compound (or related set of compounds) is called a vitamin when it cannot be synthesized in sufficient quantities by an organism and must be obtained from the diet. The term is conditional both on the circumstances and on the particular organism. For example, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is a vitamin for anthropoid primates, humans, guinea pigs and bats, but not for other mammals. Vitamin D is not an essential nutrient for people who get sufficient exposure to ultraviolet light, either from the sun or an artificial source, as they synthesize vitamin D in skin. Humans require thirteen vitamins in their diet, most of which are actually groups of related molecules, "vitamers", (e.g. vitamin E includes tocopherols and tocotrienols, vitamin K includes vitamin K1 and K2). The list: vitamins A, C, D, E, K, Thiamine (B1), Riboflavin (B2), Niacin (B3), Pantothenic Acid (B5), Vitamin B6, Biotin (B7), Folate (B9) and Vitamin B12. Vitamin intake below recommended amounts can result in signs and symptoms associated with vitamin deficiency. There is little evidence of benefit when vitamins are consumed as a dietary supplement by those who are healthy and have a nutritionally adequate diet.

The U.S. Institute of Medicine sets tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) for some of the vitamins. This does not prevent dietary supplement companies from selling products with content per serving higher than the ULs. For example, the UL for vitamin D is 100 µg (4,000 IU), but products are available without prescription at 10,000 IU.

Minerals

Minerals are the exogenous chemical elements indispensable for life. Four minerals – carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen – are essential for life but are so ubiquitous in food and drink that these are not considered nutrients and there are no recommended intakes for these as minerals. The need for nitrogen is addressed by requirements set for protein, which is composed of nitrogen-containing amino acids. Sulfur is essential, but for humans, not identified as having a recommended intake per se. Instead, recommended intakes are identified for the sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cysteine. There are dietary supplements that provide sulfur, such as taurine and methylsulfonylmethane.

The essential nutrient minerals for humans, listed in order by weight needed to be at the Recommended Dietary Allowance or Adequate Intake are potassium, chlorine, sodium, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, zinc, manganese, copper, iodine, chromium, molybdenum, selenium and cobalt (the last as a component of vitamin B12). There are other minerals which are essential for some plants and animals, but may or may not be essential for humans, such as boron and silicon. Essential and purportedly essential minerals are marketed as dietary supplements, individually and in combination with vitamins and other minerals.

Although as a general rule, dietary supplement labeling and marketing are not allowed to make disease prevention or treatment claims, the U.S. FDA has for some foods and dietary supplements reviewed the science, concluded that there is significant scientific agreement, and published specifically worded allowed health claims. An initial ruling allowing a health claim for calcium dietary supplements and osteoporosis was later amended to include calcium supplements with or without vitamin D, effective January 1, 2010. Examples of allowed wording are shown below. In order to qualify for the calcium health claim, a dietary supplement must contain at least 20% of the Reference Dietary Intake, which for calcium means at least 260 mg/serving.

  • "Adequate calcium throughout life, as part of a well-balanced diet, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis."
  • "Adequate calcium as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."
  • "Adequate calcium and vitamin D throughout life, as part of a well-balanced diet, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis."
  • "Adequate calcium and vitamin D as part of a healthful diet, along with physical activity, may reduce the risk of osteoporosis in later life."

In the same year, the European Food Safety Authority also approved a dietary supplement health claim for calcium and vitamin D and the reduction of the risk of osteoporotic fractures by reducing bone loss. The U.S. FDA also approved Qualified Health Claims (QHCs) for various health conditions for calcium, selenium and chromium picolinate. QHCs are supported by scientific evidence, but do not meet the more rigorous "significant scientific agreement" standard required for an authorized health claim. If dietary supplement companies choose to make such a claim then the FDA stipulates the exact wording of the QHC to be used on labels and in marketing materials. The wording can be onerous: "One study suggests that selenium intake may reduce the risk of bladder cancer in women. However, one smaller study showed no reduction in risk. Based on these studies, FDA concludes that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer in women."

Proteins and amino acids

Protein-containing supplements, either ready-to-drink or as powders to be mixed into water, are marketed as aids to people recovering from illness or injury, those hoping to thwart the sarcopenia of old age, to athletes who believe that strenuous physical activity increases protein requirements, to people hoping to lose weight while minimizing muscle loss, i.e., conducting a protein-sparing modified fast, and to people who want to increase muscle size for performance and appearance. Whey protein is a popular ingredient, but products may also incorporate casein, soy, pea, hemp or rice protein. A meta-analysis found a moderate degree of evidence in favor of whey protein supplements use as a safe and effective adjunct to an athlete's training and recovery, including benefits for endurance, average power, muscle mass, and reduced perceived exercise intensity.

According to US and Canadian Dietary Reference Intake guidelines, the protein Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for adults is based on 0.8 grams protein per kilogram body weight. The recommendation is for sedentary and lightly active people. Scientific reviews can conclude that a high protein diet, when combined with exercise, will increase muscle mass and strength, or conclude the opposite. The International Olympic Committee recommends protein intake targets for both strength and endurance athletes at about 1.2–1.8 g/kg body mass per day. One review proposed a maximum daily protein intake of approximately 25% of energy requirements, i.e., approximately 2.0 to 2.5 g/kg.

The same protein ingredients marketed as dietary supplements can be incorporated into meal replacement and medical food products, but those are regulated and labeled differently from supplements. In the United States, "meal replacement" products are foods and are labeled as such. These typically contain protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins and minerals. There may be content claims such as "good source of protein", "low fat" or "lactose free". Medical foods, also nutritionally complete, are designed to be used while a person is under the care of a physician or other licensed healthcare professional. Liquid medical food products – for example, Ensure – are available in regular and high protein versions.

Proteins are chains of amino acids. Nine of these proteinogenic amino acids are considered essential for humans because they cannot be produced from other compounds by the human body and so must be taken in as food. Recommended intakes, expressed as milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day, have been established. Other amino acids may be conditionally essential for certain ages or medical conditions. Amino acids, individually and in combinations, are sold as dietary supplements. The claim for supplementing with the branched chain amino acids leucine, valine and isoleucine is for stimulating muscle protein synthesis. A review of the literature concluded this claim was unwarranted. In elderly people, supplementation with just leucine resulted in a modest (0.99 kg) increase in lean body mass. The non-essential amino acid arginine, consumed in sufficient amounts, is thought to act as a donor for the synthesis of nitric oxide, a vasodilator. A review confirmed blood pressure lowering. Taurine, a popular dietary supplement ingredient with claims made for sports performance, is technically not an amino acid. It is synthesized in the body from the amino acid cysteine.

Bodybuilding supplements

Bodybuilding supplements are dietary supplements commonly used by those involved in bodybuilding, weightlifting, mixed martial arts, and athletics for the purpose of facilitating an increase in lean body mass. Bodybuilding supplements may contain ingredients that are advertised to increase a person's muscle, body weight, athletic performance, and decrease a person's percent body fat for desired muscle definition. Among the most widely used are high protein drinks, pre-workout blends, branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), glutamine, arginine, essential fatty acids, creatine, HMB, whey protein, ZMA, and weight loss products. Supplements are sold either as single ingredient preparations or in the form of "stacks" – proprietary blends of various supplements marketed as offering synergistic advantages.

Essential fatty acids

Fish oil is a commonly used fatty acid supplement because it is a source of omega-3 fatty acids. Fatty acids are strings of carbon atoms, having a range of lengths. If links are all single (C-C), then the fatty acid is called saturated; with one double bond (C=C), it is called monounsaturated; if there are two or more double bonds (C=C=C), it is called polyunsaturated. Only two fatty acids, both polyunsaturated, are considered essential to be obtained from the diet, as the others are synthesized in the body. The "essential" fatty acids are alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), an omega-3 fatty acid, and linoleic acid (LA), an omega-6 fatty acid. ALA can be elongated in the body to create other omega-3 fatty acids: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

Plant oils, particularly seed and nut oils, contain ALA. Food sources of EPA and DHA are oceanic fish, whereas dietary supplement sources include fish oil, krill oil and marine algae extracts. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) identifies 250 mg/day for a combined total of EPA and DHA as Adequate Intake, with a recommendation that women pregnant or lactating consume an additional 100 to 200 mg/day of DHA. In the United States and Canada are Adequate Intakes for ALA and LA over various stages of life, but there are no intake levels specified for EPA and/or DHA.

Supplementation with EPA and/or DHA does not appear to affect the risk of death, cancer or heart disease. Furthermore, studies of fish oil supplements have failed to support claims of preventing heart attacks or strokes. In 2017, the American Heart Association issued a science advisory stating that it could not recommend use of omega-3 fish oil supplements for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease or stroke, although it reaffirmed supplementation for people who have a history of coronary heart disease.

Manufacturers have begun to include long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids DHA and arachidonic acid (AA) into their formula milk for newborns, however, a 2017 review found that supplementation with DHA and AA does not appear to be harmful or beneficial to formula-fed infants.

Natural products

St. John's wort petals used in natural product supplements

Dietary supplements can be manufactured using intact sources or extracts from plants, animals, algae, fungi or lichens, including such examples as ginkgo biloba, curcumin, cranberry, St. John's wort, ginseng, resveratrol, glucosamine and collagen. Products bearing promotional claims of health benefits are sold without requiring a prescription in pharmacies, supermarkets, specialist shops, military commissaries, buyers clubs, direct selling organizations, and the internet. While most of these products have a long history of use in herbalism and various forms of traditional medicine, concerns exist about their actual efficacy, safety and consistency of quality. Canada has published a manufacturer and consumer guide describing quality, licensing, standards, identities, and common contaminants of natural products.

In 2019, sales of herbal supplements just in the United States alone were $9.6 billion, with the market growing at approximately 8.6% per year, with cannabidiol and mushroom product sales as the highest. Italy, Germany, and Eastern European countries were leading consumers of botanical supplements in 2016, with European Union market growth forecast to be $8.7 billion by 2020.

Probiotics

Claimed benefits of using probiotic supplements are not supported by sufficient clinical evidence. Meta-analysis studies have reported a modest reduction of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and acute diarrhea in children taking probiotics. There is limited evidence in support of adults using mono-strain and multi-strain containing probiotics for the alleviation of symptoms associated with irritable bowel syndrome. Probiotic supplements are generally regarded as safe.

Fertility

A meta-analysis provided preliminary evidence that men treated with supplements containing selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q10 or carnitines reported improvements in total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology. A review concluded that omega-3 taken through supplements and diet might improve semen quality in infertile men. A 2021 review also supported selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q10 or carnitines, but warned that "excessive use of antioxidants may be detrimental to the spermatic function and many of the over-the-counter supplements are not scientifically proven to improve fertility."

There is low quality and insufficient evidence for the use of oral antioxidant supplements as a viable treatment for subfertile woman. A review provided evidence that taking dehydroepiandrosterone before starting an in vitro fertilization series may increase pregnancy rates and decrease miscarriage likelihood.

Prenatal

Prenatal vitamins are dietary supplements commonly given to pregnant women to supply nutrients that may reduce health complications for the mother and fetus. Although prenatal vitamins are not meant to substitute for dietary nutrition, prenatal supplementation may be beneficial for pregnant women at risk of nutrient deficiencies because of diet limitations or restrictions. The most common components in prenatal vitamins include vitamins B6, folate, B12, C, D, E, iron and calcium.

Sufficient intake of vitamin B6 can lower the risk of early pregnancy loss and relieve symptoms of morning sickness. Folate is also an essential nutrient for pregnant women to prevent neural tube defects. In 2006, the World Health Organization endorsed the recommendation for women of child-bearing age to consume 400 micrograms of folate through the diet daily if planning a pregnancy. A 2013 review found folic acid supplementation during pregnancy did not affect the mother's health other than a risk reduction on low pre-delivery serum folate and megaloblastic anemia. There is little evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation improves prenatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes. Evidence does not support the routine use of vitamin E supplementation during pregnancy to prevent adverse events, such as preterm birth, fetal or neonatal death, or maternal hypertensive disorders.

Iron supplementation can lower the risk of iron deficiency anemia for pregnant women. In 2020, the World Health Organization updated recommendations for adequate calcium levels during pregnancy to prevent hypertensive disorders.

Pharmacotherapy

Individuals with hypokalemic sensory overstimulation are sometimes diagnosed as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), raising the possibility that a subtype of ADHD has a cause that can be understood mechanistically and treated in a novel way. The sensory overload is treatable with oral potassium gluconate.

Industry

In 2020, the American market for dietary supplements was valued at $140.3 billion, with the economic impact in the United States for 2016 estimated at $122 billion, including employment wages and taxes. A 2020 analysis projected that the global market for vitamins and dietary supplement products would reach $196.6 billion by 2028, where the growth in market size is largely attributed to recent technological advancements in product manufacturing, increased demand for products advertised as healthy, increased product availability, and population aging.

Adulteration, contamination and mislabeling

Over the period 2008 to 2011, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) of the United States received 6,307 reports of health problems (identified as adverse events) from use of dietary supplements containing a combination of ingredients in manufactured vitamins, minerals or other supplement products, with 92% of tested herbal supplements containing lead and 80% containing other chemical contaminants. Using undercover staff, the GAO also found that supplement retailers intentionally engaged in "unequivocal deception" to sell products advertised with baseless health claims, particularly to elderly consumers. Consumer Reports also reported unsafe levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury in several protein powder products. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) reported that protein spiking, i.e., the addition of amino acids to manipulate protein content analysis, was common. Many of the companies involved challenged CBC's claim.

A 2013 study on herbal supplements found that many products were of low quality, one third did not contain the active ingredient(s) claimed, and one third contained unlisted substances. In a genetic analysis of herbal supplements, 78% of samples contained animal DNA that was not identified as an ingredient on the product labels. In some botanical products, undeclared ingredients were used to increase the bulk of the product and reduce its cost of manufacturing, while potentially violating certain religious and/or cultural limitations on consuming animal ingredients, such as cow, buffalo or deer. In 2015, the New York Attorney General (NY-AG) identified four major retailers with dietary supplement products that contained fraudulent and potentially dangerous ingredients, requiring the companies to remove the products from retail stores. According to the NY-AG, only about 20% of the herbal supplements tested contained the plants claimed. The methodology used by the NY-AG was disputed. The test involves looking for DNA fragments from the plants named as the dietary supplement ingredients in the products. One scientist said that it was possible that the extraction process used to create the supplements removed or destroyed all DNA. This, however, would not explain the presence of DNA from plants such as rice or wheat, that were not listed as ingredients.

A study of dietary supplements sold between 2007 and 2016 identified 776 that contained unlisted pharmaceutical drugs, many of which could interact with other medications and lead to hospitalization. 86% of the adulterated supplements were marketed for weight loss and sexual performance, with many containing prescription erectile dysfunction medication. Muscle building supplements were contaminated with anabolic steroids that can lead to health complications affecting the kidney, the heart, and cause gynecomastia. Multiple bodybuilding products also contained antidepressants and antihistamines. Despite these findings, fewer than half of the adulterated supplements were recalled.

Regulatory compliance

The European Commission has published harmonized rules on supplement products to assure consumers have minimal health risks from using dietary supplements and are not misled by advertising.

In the United States and Canada, dietary supplements are considered a subset of foods, and are regulated accordingly. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) monitors supplement products for accuracy in advertising and labeling. Dietary supplements are regulated by the FDA as food products subject to compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP) and labeling with science-based ingredient descriptions and advertising. When finding CGMP or advertising violations, FDA warning letters are used to notify manufacturers of impending enforcement action, including search and seizure, injunction, and financial penalties. Examples between 2016 and 2018 of CGMP and advertising violations by dietary supplement manufacturers included several with illegal compositions or advertising of vitamins and minerals.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which litigates against deceptive advertising in marketed products, established a consumer center to assist reports of false health claims in product advertising for dietary supplements. In 2017, the FTC successfully sued nine manufacturers for deceptive advertising of dietary supplements.

Adverse effects

In the United States, manufacturers of dietary supplements are required to demonstrate safety of their products before approval is granted for commerce. Despite this caution, numerous adverse effects have been reported, including muscle cramps, hair loss, joint pain, liver disease, and allergic reactions, with 29% of the adverse effects resulting in hospitalization, and 20% in serious injuries or illnesses. The potential for adverse effects also occurs when individuals consume more than the necessary daily amount of vitamins or minerals that are needed to maintain normal body processes and functions. The incidence of adverse effects reported to the FDA were due to "combination products" that contain multiple ingredients, whereas dietary supplements containing a single vitamin, mineral, lipid product, and herbal product were less likely to cause adverse effects related to excess supplementation.

Among general reasons for the possible harmful effects of dietary supplements are: a) absorption in a short time, b) manufacturing quality and contamination, and c) enhancing both positive and negative effects at the same time. The incidence of liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements is about 16–20% of all supplement products causing injury, with the occurrence growing globally over the early 21st century. The most common liver injuries from weight loss and bodybuilding supplements involve hepatocellular damage with resulting jaundice, and the most common supplement ingredients attributed to these injuries are green tea catechins, anabolic steroids, and the herbal extract, aegeline. Weight loss supplements have also had adverse psychiatric effects. Some dietary supplements may also have adverse interactions with prescription medications that may enhance side effects or decrease therapeutic effects of medications.

Society and culture

Public health

Work done by scientists in the early 20th century on identifying individual nutrients in food and developing ways to manufacture them raised hopes that optimal health could be achieved and diseases prevented by adding them to food and providing people with dietary supplements; while there were successes in preventing vitamin deficiencies, and preventing conditions like neural tube defects by supplementation and food fortification with folic acid, no targeted supplementation or fortification strategies to prevent major diseases like cancer or cardiovascular diseases have proved successful.

For example, while increased consumption of fruits and vegetables are related to decreases in mortality, cardiovascular diseases and cancers, supplementation with key factors found in fruits and vegetable, like antioxidants, vitamins, or minerals, do not help and some have been found to be harmful in some cases. In general, as of 2016, robust clinical data is lacking, that shows that any kind of dietary supplementation does more good than harm for people who are healthy and eating a reasonable diet but there is clear data showing that dietary pattern and lifestyle choices are associated with health outcomes.

As a result of the lack of good data for supplementation and the strong data for dietary pattern, public health recommendations for healthy eating urge people to eat a plant-based diet of whole foods, minimizing ultra-processed food, salt and sugar and to get exercise daily, and to abandon Western pattern diets and a sedentary lifestyle.

Legal regulation

United States

The regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is governed by various statutes enacted by the United States Congress. Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and accompanying legislation, the FDA has authority to oversee the quality of substances sold as food in the United States, and to monitor claims made in the labeling about both the composition and the health benefits of foods.

Substances which the FDA regulates as food are subdivided into various categories, including foods, food additives, added substances (man-made substances which are not intentionally introduced into food, but nevertheless end up in it), and dietary supplements. The specific standards which the FDA exercises differ from one category to the next. Furthermore, the FDA has been granted a variety of means by which it can address violations of the standards for a given category of substances.

Dietary supplement manufacture is required to comply with the good manufacturing practices established in 2007. The FDA can visit manufacturing facilities, send Warning Letters if not in compliance with GMPs, stop production, and if there is a health risk, require that the company conduct a recall. Only after a dietary supplement product is marketed, may the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) review the products for safety and effectiveness.

European Union

The European Union's (EU) Food Supplements Directive of 2002 requires that supplements be demonstrated to be safe, both in dosages and in purity. Only those supplements that have been proven to be safe may be sold in the EU without prescription. As a category of food, food supplements cannot be labeled with drug claims but can bear health claims and nutrition claims.

The dietary supplements industry in the United Kingdom (UK), one of the 28 countries in the bloc, strongly opposed the Directive. In addition, a large number of consumers throughout Europe, including over one million in the UK, and various doctors and scientists, had signed petitions by 2005 against what are viewed by the petitioners as unjustified restrictions of consumer choice. In 2004, along with two British trade associations, the Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) had a legal challenge to the Food Supplements Directive referred to the European Court of Justice by the High Court in London.

Although the European Court of Justice's Advocate General subsequently said that the bloc's plan to tighten rules on the sale of vitamins and food supplements should be scrapped, he was eventually overruled by the European Court, which decided that the measures in question were necessary and appropriate for the purpose of protecting public health. ANH, however, interpreted the ban as applying only to synthetically produced supplements, and not to vitamins and minerals normally found in or consumed as part of the diet. Nevertheless, the European judges acknowledged the Advocate General's concerns, stating that there must be clear procedures to allow substances to be added to the permitted list based on scientific evidence. They also said that any refusal to add the product to the list must be open to challenge in the courts.

Fraudulent products during the COVID-19 outbreak

During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, the FDA and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warned consumers about marketing scams of fraudulent supplement products, including homeopathic remedies, cannabidiol products, teas, essential oils, tinctures and colloidal silver, among others. By August 2020, the FDA and FTC had issued warning letters to dozens of companies advertising scam products, which were purported "to be drugs, medical devices or vaccines. Products that claim to cure, mitigate, treat, diagnose or prevent disease, but are not proven safe and effective for those purposes, defraud consumers of money and can place consumers at risk for serious harm"

Research

Examples of ongoing government research organizations to better understand the potential health properties and safety of dietary supplements are the European Food Safety Authority, the Office of Dietary Supplements of the United States National Institutes of Health, the Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate of Canada, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia. Together with public and private research groups, these agencies construct databases on supplement properties, perform research on quality, safety, and population trends of supplement use, and evaluate the potential clinical efficacy of supplements for maintaining health or lowering disease risk.

Databases

As continual research on the properties of supplements accumulates, databases or fact sheets for various supplements are updated regularly, including the Dietary Supplement Label Database, Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database, and Dietary Supplement Facts Sheets of the United States. In Canada where a license is issued when a supplement product has been proven by the manufacturer and government to be safe, effective and of sufficient quality for its recommended use, an eight-digit Natural Product Number is assigned and recorded in a Licensed Natural Health Products Database. The European Food Safety Authority maintains a compendium of botanical ingredients used in manufacturing of dietary supplements.

In 2015, the Australian Government's Department of Health published the results of a review of herbal supplements to determine if any were suitable for coverage by health insurance. Establishing guidelines to assess safety and efficacy of botanical supplement products, the European Medicines Agency provided criteria for evaluating and grading the quality of clinical research in preparing monographs about herbal supplements. In the United States, the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health provides fact sheets evaluating the safety, potential effectiveness and side effects of many botanical products.

Quality and safety

To assure supplements have sufficient quality, standardization, and safety for public consumption, research efforts have focused on development of reference materials for supplement manufacturing and monitoring. High-dose products have received research attention, especially for emergency situations such as vitamin A deficiency in malnutrition of children, and for women taking folate supplements to reduce the risk of breast cancer.

Population monitoring

In the United States, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has investigated habits of using dietary supplements in context of total nutrient intakes from the diet in adults and children. Over the period of 1999 to 2012, use of multivitamins decreased, and there was wide variability in the use of individual supplements among subgroups by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and educational status. Particular attention has been given to use of folate supplements by young women to reduce the risk of fetal neural tube defects.

Clinical studies

Limited human research has been conducted on the potential for dietary supplementation to affect disease risk. Examples:

  • vitamin D – acute respiratory tract infections
  • iron – maternal iron deficiency anemia and adverse effects on the fetus
  • multiple supplements – no evidence of benefit to lower risk of death, cardiovascular diseases or cancer
  • magnesium supplementation – in reducing all-cause and cancer mortality, as well as improving glucose parameters in people with diabetes and insulin-sensitivity parameters in those at high risk of diabetes.
  • folate alone or with B vitamins – stroke

A 2017 academic review indicated a rising incidence of liver injury from use of herbal and dietary supplements, particularly those with steroids, green tea extract, or multiple ingredients.

Absence of benefit

The potential benefit of using essential nutrient dietary supplements to lower the risk of diseases has been refuted by findings of no effect or weak evidence in numerous clinical reviews, such as for HIV, or tuberculosis.

Reporting bias

A review of clinical trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov, which would include both drugs and supplements, reported that nearly half of completed trials were sponsored wholly or partially by industry. This does not automatically imply bias, but there is evidence that because of selective non-reporting, results in support of a potential drug or supplement ingredient are more likely to be published than results that do not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit. One review reported that fewer than half of the registered clinical trials resulted in publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Future

Improving public information about use of dietary supplements involves investments in professional training programs, further studies of population and nutrient needs, expanding the database information, enhancing collaborations between governments and universities, and translating dietary supplement research into useful information for consumers, health professionals, scientists, and policymakers. Future demonstration of efficacy from use of dietary supplements requires high-quality clinical research using rigorously qualified products and compliance with established guidelines for reporting of clinical trial results (e.g., CONSORT guidelines).

See also

Further reading

  • Food and Nutrition Information Center. "Dietary Supplements: General Resources for Consumers" (PDF). National Agricultural Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16. List of resources that provides an overview of herbal and dietary supplements, including use, regulation, research, and cautionary information.
  • "Questions to Ask Before Taking Vitamin and Mineral Supplements". nutrition.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-06-22.
  • "Dietary Supplement Fact Sheets". NIH Office of Dietary Supplements.

External links