Translations:Effects of climate change on livestock/12/en: Difference between revisions

From Azupedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FuzzyBot (talk | contribs)
Importing a new version from external source
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 10:02, 19 July 2025

Information about message (contribute)
This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Effects of climate change on livestock)
===Economic impact and adaptation===
[[File:Schauberger_2019_heat_exchanger.png|thumb|This diagram shows a proposed design of a heat exchanger for indoor rearing facilities, whose installation would help to protect livestock from heat stress.]]
In the United States alone, economic losses caused by heat stress in livestock were already valued at between $1.69 and $2.36 billion in 2003, with the spread reflecting different assumptions about the effectiveness of contemporary adaptation measures. Nevertheless, some reviews consider the United States to be the least vulnerable nation to food security shocks caused by the negative impacts of climate change on livestock, as while it rates in the middle of the pack in terms of ''exposure'' of its livestock and the societal ''sensitivity'' to that exposure, it has the highest ''adaptive'' capacity in the world due to its GDP and development status. Japan and the nations in Europe have low vulnerability for similar reasons.

Economic impact and adaptation

This diagram shows a proposed design of a heat exchanger for indoor rearing facilities, whose installation would help to protect livestock from heat stress.

In the United States alone, economic losses caused by heat stress in livestock were already valued at between $1.69 and $2.36 billion in 2003, with the spread reflecting different assumptions about the effectiveness of contemporary adaptation measures. Nevertheless, some reviews consider the United States to be the least vulnerable nation to food security shocks caused by the negative impacts of climate change on livestock, as while it rates in the middle of the pack in terms of exposure of its livestock and the societal sensitivity to that exposure, it has the highest adaptive capacity in the world due to its GDP and development status. Japan and the nations in Europe have low vulnerability for similar reasons.