<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.tiffa.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Translations%3AAngiotensin_II_receptor_blocker%2F16%2Fen</id>
	<title>Translations:Angiotensin II receptor blocker/16/en - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.tiffa.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Translations%3AAngiotensin_II_receptor_blocker%2F16%2Fen"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.tiffa.net/w/index.php?title=Translations:Angiotensin_II_receptor_blocker/16/en&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-10T07:58:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.tiffa.net/w/index.php?title=Translations:Angiotensin_II_receptor_blocker/16/en&amp;diff=131248&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>FuzzyBot: Importing a new version from external source</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.tiffa.net/w/index.php?title=Translations:Angiotensin_II_receptor_blocker/16/en&amp;diff=131248&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-03-25T09:03:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Importing a new version from external source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In May 2013, a senior regulator at the Food &amp;amp; Drug Administration, Medical Team Leader Thomas A. Marciniak, revealed publicly that contrary to the FDA&amp;#039;s official conclusion that there was no increased cancer risk, after a patient-by-patient examination of the available FDA data he had concluded that there was a lung-cancer risk increase of about 24% in ARB patients, compared with patients taking a placebo or other drugs. One of the criticisms Marciniak made was that the earlier FDA meta-analysis did not count lung [[carcinomas]] as cancers. In ten of the eleven studies he examined, Marciniak said that there were more lung cancer cases in the ARB group than the control group. Ellis Unger, chief of the drug-evaluation division that includes Marciniak, was quoted as calling the complaints a &amp;quot;diversion,&amp;quot; and saying in an interview, &amp;quot;We have no reason to tell the public anything new.&amp;quot; In an article about the dispute, the Wall Street Journal interviewed three other doctors to get their views; one had &amp;quot;no doubt&amp;quot; ARBs increased cancer risk, one was concerned and wanted to see more data, and the third thought there was either no relationship or a hard to detect, low-frequency relationship.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FuzzyBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>